Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 15.07.2026 | Lexington - New Mexico United | 1 : 4 |
| 28.09.2025 | New Mexico United - Lexington | 2 : 1 |
| 14.06.2025 | Lexington - New Mexico United | 2 : 1 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22.08.2026 | Loudoun United - New Mexico United | 0 - 0 | D |
| 16.08.2026 | New Mexico United - FC Tulsa | 1 - 0 | W |
| 09.08.2026 | Monterey Bay - New Mexico United | 2 - 5 | W |
| 02.08.2026 | New Mexico United - Colorado Springs | 1 - 0 | W |
| 25.07.2026 | Birmingham Legion - New Mexico United | - |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22.08.2026 | Lexington - Las Vegas Lights | 2 - 0 | W |
| 16.08.2026 | Sacramento Republic - Lexington | 1 - 0 | L |
| 08.08.2026 | Lexington - Phoenix Rising | 1 - 0 | W |
| 01.08.2026 | Lexington - Monterey Bay | 3 - 2 | W |
| 26.07.2026 | FC Tulsa - Lexington | 0 - 0 | D |
The upcoming match between New Mexico United and Lexington is scheduled for 27.08.2026 01:30 in USL Championship. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Standings and season form
New Mexico United are in position 1 with 34 points after 15 matches. The season record is 8 wins, 3 draws and 4 losses. The goals record is 20 scored and 15 conceded. The stored form sequence is DWWWW. Lexington are in position 7 with 31 points after 17 matches. The season record is 7 wins, 4 draws and 6 losses. The goals record is 27 scored and 22 conceded. The stored form sequence is WLWWD.
New Mexico United recorded 7 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is DWWWWWWDWD. The averages are 2 goals scored and 0.80 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 40% finished with over 2.5 goals. Lexington recorded 5 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WLWWDWLLWD. The averages are 1.50 goals scored and 1.20 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 40% of those matches, while 40% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 3 head-to-head matches, New Mexico United recorded 2 wins, there were 0 draws, and Lexington recorded 1 wins. The average total was 3.67 goals per match. Both teams scored in 100% of those matches, while 100% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Under 2.5 goals — 70%; Under 3.5 goals — 70%; Over 1.5 goals — 50%; Both teams to score — 30%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 30%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
2 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. Goals Over/Under — Over 1.5 (odds 1.22, score 74/100, 74.19% bucket win rate across 496 observations). At least one goal in the match (quota 13, score 78/100, 77.80% group success rate across 3103 observations).
The discipline profile for New Mexico United at home is based on 7 matches. The team averages 3.29 yellow cards, 0.00 red cards and 3.29 total cards per match. At least 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cards were recorded in 100.0%, 85.7%, 71.4%, 28.6% and 28.6% of those matches respectively, while a red card occurred in 0.0%. Season card data is available for 12 of 18 completed matches (66.7% coverage). The discipline profile for Lexington away from home is based on 6 matches. The team averages 2.83 yellow cards, 0.17 red cards and 3.00 total cards per match. At least 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cards were recorded in 100.0%, 83.3%, 50.0%, 33.3% and 16.7% of those matches respectively, while a red card occurred in 16.7%. Season card data is available for 13 of 17 completed matches (76.5% coverage).
The match between New Mexico United and Lexington ended 2-1. The game produced 3 goals in total. The first half contained 0 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The historical profile from 3 head-to-head meetings averaged 3.67 goals, while this match produced 3. The result remained within one goal of the historical average. Across the previous 3 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was BTTS at 100%. The actual outcome for this indicator was BTTS. The final result aligned with that historical profile. Across the previous 3 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Over 2.5 at 100%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Over 2.5. The final result aligned with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated No BTTS at 70%. The actual outcome was BTTS. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 2.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 0.5 HT at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
The stored Premium market was Over 1.5 FT at odds of 1.22. The actual market outcome was Over 1.5 FT. The Premium signal was confirmed. The stored Premium market was At least one FT goal with quota 13. The actual market outcome was At least one FT goal. The Premium signal was confirmed.
Of 10 verifiable pre-match indicators, 8 aligned with the final result and 2 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.