Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 21.09.2024 | Rhode Island - FC Tulsa | 2 : 1 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23.08.2026 | Orange County SC - FC Tulsa | 1 - 5 | W |
| 16.08.2026 | New Mexico United - FC Tulsa | 1 - 0 | L |
| 09.08.2026 | FC Tulsa - Detroit City | 0 - 1 | L |
| 06.08.2026 | FC Tulsa - Sacramento Republic | 1 - 0 | W |
| 29.07.2026 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds - FC Tulsa | 0 - 1 | W |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22.08.2026 | Rhode Island - Monterey Bay | 3 - 1 | W |
| 15.08.2026 | Tampa Bay Rowdies - Rhode Island | 2 - 0 | L |
| 08.08.2026 | Rhode Island - Colorado Springs | 2 - 0 | W |
| 02.08.2026 | Birmingham Legion - Rhode Island | 1 - 0 | L |
| 25.07.2026 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds - Rhode Island | 0 - 1 | W |
The upcoming match between FC Tulsa and Rhode Island is scheduled for 30.08.2026 00:30 in USL Championship. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Standings and season form
FC Tulsa are in position 4 with 32 points after 17 matches. The season record is 8 wins, 5 draws and 4 losses. The goals record is 20 scored and 16 conceded. The stored form sequence is WLLWW. Rhode Island are in position 7 with 28 points after 16 matches. The season record is 6 wins, 4 draws and 6 losses. The goals record is 25 scored and 19 conceded. The stored form sequence is WLWLW.
FC Tulsa recorded 5 wins, 1 draws and 4 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WLLWWDWLLW. The averages are 1.20 goals scored and 0.80 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 30% of those matches, while 30% finished with over 2.5 goals. Rhode Island recorded 5 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WLWLWWDLDW. The averages are 1.40 goals scored and 0.90 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 30% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 1 head-to-head matches, FC Tulsa recorded 0 wins, there were 0 draws, and Rhode Island recorded 1 wins. The average total was 3 goals per match. Both teams scored in 100% of those matches, while 100% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Under 2.5 goals — 80%; Under 3.5 goals — 80%; Over 1.5 goals — 40%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 30%; Both teams to score — 20%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The normalized movement for the Asian pair FC Tulsa -1 / Rhode Island +1 supports FC Tulsa by an average 2.22 percentage points across 3 bookmakers (Pinnacle, Bet365, 1xBet) with up to 12 stored observations. This is a market signal, not a result guarantee.
1 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. Odd/Even — Odd (odds 2).
The discipline profile for FC Tulsa at home is based on 7 matches. The team averages 2.57 yellow cards, 0.00 red cards and 2.57 total cards per match. At least 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cards were recorded in 100.0%, 85.7%, 42.9%, 14.3% and 14.3% of those matches respectively, while a red card occurred in 0.0%. Season card data is available for 13 of 20 completed matches (65.0% coverage). The discipline profile for Rhode Island away from home is based on 6 matches. The team averages 1.83 yellow cards, 0.00 red cards and 1.83 total cards per match. At least 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cards were recorded in 100.0%, 66.7%, 16.7%, 0.0% and 0.0% of those matches respectively, while a red card occurred in 0.0%. Season card data is available for 13 of 17 completed matches (76.5% coverage).
The match between FC Tulsa and Rhode Island ended 1-0. The game produced 1 goal in total. The first half contained 1 goal. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated No BTTS at 80%. The actual outcome was No BTTS. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 2.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Under 2.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 0.5 HT at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 80%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
The Asian-handicap signal locked before kickoff supported FC Tulsa at -1. The stored market movement was 2.22 percentage points across 3 bookmakers. At the final score of 1-0, the line settled as a push. The result is neutral and is counted as neither confirmed nor unconfirmed.
The stored Premium market was Odd at odds of 2. The actual market outcome was Odd. The Premium signal was confirmed.
Of 7 verifiable pre-match indicators, 5 aligned with the final result and 1 were not confirmed, while 1 settled neutrally. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.