Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 06.06.2026 | EIF - MP | 1 : 0 |
| 31.05.2026 | MP - EIF | 1 : 0 |
| 23.09.2023 | MP - EIF | 0 : 2 |
| 27.08.2023 | EIF - MP | 2 : 1 |
| 11.06.2023 | MP - EIF | 0 : 0 |
| 07.08.2022 | MP - EIF | 2 : 2 |
| 05.06.2022 | EIF - MP | 2 : 2 |
| 17.07.2021 | EIF - MP | 2 : 1 |
| 13.05.2021 | MP - EIF | 2 : 1 |
| 10.10.2020 | EIF - MP | 3 : 0 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07.08.2026 | JäPS - MP | 1 - 0 | L |
| 29.07.2026 | MP - KäPa | 2 - 1 | W |
| 25.07.2026 | MP - Kooteepee | 3 - 3 | D |
| 15.07.2026 | JIPPO - MP | 3 - 1 | L |
| 11.07.2026 | SJK Akatemia - MP | 1 - 1 | D |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08.08.2026 | KäPa - EIF | 0 - 1 | W |
| 31.07.2026 | EIF - Klubi-04 | 2 - 0 | W |
| 25.07.2026 | SJK Akatemia - EIF | 0 - 0 | D |
| 18.07.2026 | EIF - JäPS | 0 - 1 | L |
| 11.07.2026 | Haka - EIF | 3 - 1 | L |
The upcoming match between MP and EIF is scheduled for 16.08.2026 14:00 in Ykkösliiga. The listed venue is Mikkelin Urheilupuisto, Mikkeli. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Standings and season form
MP are in position 7 with 21 points after 18 matches. The season record is 6 wins, 3 draws and 9 losses. The goals record is 19 scored and 24 conceded. The stored form sequence is LWDLD. EIF are in position 6 with 23 points after 17 matches. The season record is 6 wins, 2 draws and 9 losses. The goals record is 23 scored and 30 conceded. The stored form sequence is WWDLL.
MP recorded 3 wins, 3 draws and 4 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LWDLDWLDLW. The averages are 1.30 goals scored and 1.50 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 70% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals. EIF recorded 3 wins, 2 draws and 5 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WWDLLLDLWL. The averages are 0.70 goals scored and 1.40 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 30% of those matches, while 30% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 10 head-to-head matches, MP recorded 2 wins, there were 3 draws, and EIF recorded 5 wins. The average total was 2.40 goals per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Under 3.5 goals — 70%; Over 1.5 goals — 60%; Under 2.5 goals — 60%; Both teams to score — 50%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 40%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
2 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. Goals Over/Under — Under 3.5 (odds 1.44, score 82/100, 75% bucket win rate across 20 observations). Goals Over/Under — Over 1.5 (odds 1.20, score 78/100, 77.90% bucket win rate across 448 observations).
The discipline profile for MP at home is based on 6 matches. The team averages 1.50 yellow cards, 0.00 red cards and 1.50 total cards per match. At least 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cards were recorded in 100.0%, 33.3%, 16.7%, 0.0% and 0.0% of those matches respectively, while a red card occurred in 0.0%. Season card data is available for 13 of 18 completed matches (72.2% coverage). The discipline profile for EIF away from home is based on 7 matches. The team averages 2.00 yellow cards, 0.14 red cards and 2.14 total cards per match. At least 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cards were recorded in 100.0%, 42.9%, 42.9%, 14.3% and 14.3% of those matches respectively, while a red card occurred in 14.3%. Season card data is available for 15 of 18 completed matches (83.3% coverage).
The match between MP and EIF ended 0-2. The game produced 2 goals in total. The first half contained 2 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The historical profile from 10 head-to-head meetings averaged 2.4 goals, while this match produced 2. The result remained within one goal of the historical average. Across the previous 10 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Over 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Under 2.5. The final result did not align with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 2.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 0.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result.
Before kickoff, the discipline profile for MP at home was based on 6 matches, with averages of 1.5 yellow cards, 0 red cards and 1.5 total cards per match. In this game, MP received 3 yellow cards and 0 red cards, 3 in total. That was 1.5 cards above the stored average. In the pre-match sample, 3+ cards occurred in 16.7% of matches, 5+ in 0%, and a red card in 0%. Before kickoff, the discipline profile for EIF away from home was based on 7 matches, with averages of 2 yellow cards, 0.14 red cards and 2.14 total cards per match. In this game, EIF received 1 yellow cards and 0 red cards, 1 in total. That was 1.14 cards below the stored average. In the pre-match sample, 3+ cards occurred in 42.9% of matches, 5+ in 14.3%, and a red card in 14.3%.
The stored Premium market was Over 1.5 FT at odds of 1.2. The actual market outcome was Over 1.5 FT. The Premium signal was confirmed.
Of 8 verifiable pre-match indicators, 5 aligned with the final result and 3 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.