Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08.08.2026 | Stocksund - Gefle IF | 5 - 0 | L |
| 01.08.2026 | Piteå - Gefle IF | 0 - 2 | W |
| 27.06.2026 | Gefle IF - Stocksund | 2 - 1 | W |
| 18.06.2026 | Gefle IF - Stockholm Internazionale | 0 - 2 | L |
| 13.06.2026 | IF Karlstad - Gefle IF | 2 - 0 | L |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09.08.2026 | Umeå FC - AFC Eskilstuna | 1 - 3 | L |
| 02.08.2026 | AFC Eskilstuna - Umeå FC | 1 - 0 | L |
| 26.07.2026 | Umeå FC - Täfteå | 0 - 0 | D |
| 28.06.2026 | Umeå FC - Järfälla | 1 - 3 | L |
| 21.06.2026 | Enköping - Umeå FC | 3 - 1 | L |
The upcoming match between Gefle IF and Umeå FC is scheduled for 15.08.2026 11:00 in Ettan - Norra. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Standings and season form
Gefle IF are in position 11 with 17 points after 15 matches. The season record is 5 wins, 2 draws and 8 losses. The goals record is 19 scored and 29 conceded. The stored form sequence is LWWLL. Umeå FC are in position 12 with 16 points after 15 matches. The season record is 4 wins, 4 draws and 7 losses. The goals record is 20 scored and 25 conceded. The stored form sequence is LLLLW.
Gefle IF recorded 3 wins, 2 draws and 5 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LWWLLDLWLD. The averages are 0.70 goals scored and 2 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 20% of those matches, while 50% finished with over 2.5 goals. Umeå FC recorded 2 wins, 3 draws and 5 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LLLLWDDLDW. The averages are 1.40 goals scored and 1.70 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 70% of those matches, while 50% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 0.5 first-half goals — 80%; Over 1.5 goals — 80%; Under 3.5 goals — 70%; Under 2.5 goals — 60%; Over 2.5 goals — 40%. The stored corner indicators are: average total corners — 10.31; over 7.5 corners — 100%; over 8.5 corners — 100%; over 9.5 corners — 100%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The normalized movement for the Asian pair Gefle IF 0 / Umeå FC 0 supports Gefle IF by an average 2.74 percentage points across 3 bookmakers (Pinnacle, Bet365, 1xBet) with up to 6 stored observations. This is a market signal, not a result guarantee.
The discipline profile for Gefle IF at home is based on 1 matches. The team averages 2.00 yellow cards, 0.00 red cards and 2.00 total cards per match. At least 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cards were recorded in 100.0%, 100.0%, 0.0%, 0.0% and 0.0% of those matches respectively, while a red card occurred in 0.0%. Season card data is available for 4 of 16 completed matches (25.0% coverage). The discipline profile for Umeå FC away from home is based on 3 matches. The team averages 1.67 yellow cards, 0.00 red cards and 1.67 total cards per match. At least 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cards were recorded in 100.0%, 66.7%, 0.0%, 0.0% and 0.0% of those matches respectively, while a red card occurred in 0.0%. Season card data is available for 6 of 16 completed matches (37.5% coverage).
The match between Gefle IF and Umeå FC ended 2-0. The game produced 2 goals in total. The first half contained 1 goal. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated No BTTS at 70%. The actual outcome was No BTTS. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 2.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 80%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
Before kickoff, the discipline profile for Gefle IF at home was based on 1 matches, with averages of 2 yellow cards, 0 red cards and 2 total cards per match. In this game, Gefle IF received 1 yellow cards and 0 red cards, 1 in total. That was 1 cards below the stored average. In the pre-match sample, 3+ cards occurred in 0% of matches, 5+ in 0%, and a red card in 0%. Before kickoff, the discipline profile for Umeå FC away from home was based on 3 matches, with averages of 1.67 yellow cards, 0 red cards and 1.67 total cards per match. In this game, Umeå FC received 2 yellow cards and 0 red cards, 2 in total. That was 0.33 cards above the stored average. In the pre-match sample, 3+ cards occurred in 0% of matches, 5+ in 0%, and a red card in 0%.
The Asian-handicap signal locked before kickoff supported Gefle IF at 0. The stored market movement was 2.74 percentage points across 3 bookmakers. At the final score of 2-0, the line settled as a full win. The Asian-handicap signal was confirmed.
Of 7 verifiable pre-match indicators, 7 aligned with the final result and 0 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.