Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 28.03.2026 | Seattle Reign FC - Racing Louisville W | 2 : 1 |
| 15.09.2025 | Seattle Reign FC - Racing Louisville W | 0 : 0 |
| 17.05.2025 | Racing Louisville W - Seattle Reign FC | 0 : 1 |
| 31.08.2024 | Racing Louisville W - Seattle Reign FC | 2 : 3 |
| 23.06.2024 | Seattle Reign FC - Racing Louisville W | 1 : 1 |
| 07.09.2023 | Seattle Reign FC - Racing Louisville W | 0 : 1 |
| 01.07.2023 | Seattle Reign FC - Racing Louisville W | 2 : 2 |
| 29.04.2023 | Racing Louisville W - Seattle Reign FC | 2 : 2 |
| 03.08.2022 | Racing Louisville W - Seattle Reign FC | 1 : 1 |
| 08.05.2022 | Seattle Reign FC - Racing Louisville W | 2 : 2 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19.08.2026 | Racing Louisville W - Seattle Reign FC | 2 - 1 | W |
| 15.08.2026 | Racing Louisville W - Boston Legacy W | 4 - 1 | W |
| 07.08.2026 | Orlando Pride W - Racing Louisville W | 1 - 3 | W |
| 01.08.2026 | Racing Louisville W - Chicago Red Stars W | 2 - 1 | W |
| 30.07.2026 | Kansas City W - Racing Louisville W | 5 - 1 | L |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19.08.2026 | Racing Louisville W - Seattle Reign FC | 2 - 1 | L |
| 15.08.2026 | Seattle Reign FC - Chicago Red Stars W | 1 - 0 | W |
| 10.08.2026 | Seattle Reign FC - Angel City W | 2 - 2 | D |
| 02.08.2026 | Bay FC - Seattle Reign FC | 2 - 3 | W |
| 26.07.2026 | San Diego Wave W - Seattle Reign FC | 0 - 2 | W |
The upcoming match between Racing Louisville W and Seattle Reign FC is scheduled for 19.08.2026 22:30 in NWSL Women. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Standings and season form
Racing Louisville W are in position 15 with 17 points after 17 matches. The season record is 4 wins, 2 draws and 11 losses. The goals record is 21 scored and 34 conceded. The stored form sequence is WWLWD. Seattle Reign FC are in position 9 with 24 points after 16 matches. The season record is 7 wins, 2 draws and 7 losses. The goals record is 20 scored and 21 conceded. The stored form sequence is DWWLW.
Racing Louisville W recorded 5 wins, 1 draws and 4 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WWWLWDLLLW. The averages are 1.60 goals scored and 1.90 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 80% finished with over 2.5 goals. Seattle Reign FC recorded 5 wins, 1 draws and 4 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WDWWLWLLWL. The averages are 1.60 goals scored and 1.50 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 10 head-to-head matches, Racing Louisville W recorded 1 wins, there were 6 draws, and Seattle Reign FC recorded 3 wins. The average total was 2.60 goals per match. Both teams scored in 70% of those matches, while 50% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 1.5 goals — 100%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 90%; Both teams to score — 80%; Over 2.5 goals — 70%; Over 1.5 first-half goals — 50%. The stored corner indicators are: average total corners — 9.77; over 7.5 corners — 100%; over 8.5 corners — 100%; over 9.5 corners — 100%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The normalized movement for the Asian pair Racing Louisville W -0.25 / Seattle Reign FC +0.25 supports Racing Louisville W by an average 5.17 percentage points across 3 bookmakers (Pinnacle, Bet365, 1xBet) with up to 16 stored observations. This is a market signal, not a result guarantee.
2 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. At least one goal in the match (quota 13, score 78/100, 77.57% group success rate across 2960 observations). Goals Over/Under — Over 1.5 (odds 1.22, score 75/100, 75.41% bucket win rate across 423 observations).
The discipline profile for Racing Louisville W at home is based on 8 matches. The team averages 1.38 yellow cards, 0.00 red cards and 1.38 total cards per match. At least 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cards were recorded in 87.5%, 25.0%, 12.5%, 12.5% and 0.0% of those matches respectively, while a red card occurred in 0.0%. Season card data is available for 16 of 17 completed matches (94.1% coverage). The discipline profile for Seattle Reign FC away from home is based on 8 matches. The team averages 1.88 yellow cards, 0.00 red cards and 1.88 total cards per match. At least 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cards were recorded in 100.0%, 50.0%, 25.0%, 12.5% and 0.0% of those matches respectively, while a red card occurred in 0.0%. Season card data is available for 16 of 16 completed matches (100.0% coverage).
The match between Racing Louisville W and Seattle Reign FC ended 2-1. The game produced 3 goals in total. The first half contained 2 goals. The verified final statistics recorded 8 corners in total. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The historical profile from 10 head-to-head meetings averaged 2.6 goals, while this match produced 3. The result remained within one goal of the historical average. Across the previous 10 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was BTTS at 70%. The actual outcome for this indicator was BTTS. The final result aligned with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated BTTS at 80%. The actual outcome was BTTS. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 100%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. The stored pre-match average was 9.77 total corners. The match recorded 8 corners in total. The result differed by more than one corner from the stored average. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 7.5 corners at 100%. The actual outcome was Over 7.5 corners. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 8.5 corners at 100%. The actual outcome was Under 8.5 corners. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 9.5 corners at 100%. The actual outcome was Under 9.5 corners. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 90%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
Before kickoff, the discipline profile for Racing Louisville W at home was based on 8 matches, with averages of 1.38 yellow cards, 0 red cards and 1.38 total cards per match. In this game, Racing Louisville W received 0 yellow cards and 0 red cards, 0 in total. That was 1.38 cards below the stored average. In the pre-match sample, 3+ cards occurred in 12.5% of matches, 5+ in 0%, and a red card in 0%. Before kickoff, the discipline profile for Seattle Reign FC away from home was based on 8 matches, with averages of 1.88 yellow cards, 0 red cards and 1.88 total cards per match. In this game, Seattle Reign FC received 1 yellow cards and 0 red cards, 1 in total. That was 0.88 cards below the stored average. In the pre-match sample, 3+ cards occurred in 25% of matches, 5+ in 0%, and a red card in 0%.
The Asian-handicap signal locked before kickoff supported Racing Louisville W at -0.25. The stored market movement was 5.17 percentage points across 3 bookmakers. At the final score of 2-1, the line settled as a full win. The Asian-handicap signal was confirmed.
The stored Premium market was At least one FT goal with quota 13. The actual market outcome was At least one FT goal. The Premium signal was confirmed. The stored Premium market was Over 1.5 FT at odds of 1.22. The actual market outcome was Over 1.5 FT. The Premium signal was confirmed.
Of 13 verifiable pre-match indicators, 10 aligned with the final result and 3 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.