Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 05.06.2026 | Grebbestad - Husqvarna | 1 : 2 |
| 10.11.2018 | Husqvarna - Grebbestad | 2 : 3 |
| 30.06.2018 | Grebbestad - Husqvarna | 1 : 2 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27.08.2026 | Husqvarna - Gais | 0 - 7 | L |
| 21.08.2026 | Kumla - Husqvarna | 2 - 6 | W |
| 14.08.2026 | Husqvarna - Skara | 1 - 0 | W |
| 09.08.2026 | Motala - Husqvarna | 0 - 1 | W |
| 01.07.2026 | Husqvarna - Lidköping | 0 - 0 | D |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22.08.2026 | Grebbestad - Stenungsund | 1 - 1 | D |
| 14.08.2026 | Ahlafors - Grebbestad | 3 - 1 | L |
| 08.08.2026 | Grebbestad - IFK Skövde | 1 - 1 | D |
| 31.07.2026 | IF Karlstad II - Grebbestad | 1 - 2 | W |
| 24.06.2026 | Grebbestad - Kumla | 2 - 1 | W |
The upcoming match between Husqvarna and Grebbestad is scheduled for 30.08.2026 11:00 in Division 2 - Norra Götaland. The listed venue is Vapenvallen, Huskvarna. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Standings and season form
Husqvarna are in position 1 with 48 points after 15 matches. The season record is 12 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses. The goals record is 36 scored and 10 conceded. The stored form sequence is WWWDW. Grebbestad are in position 5 with 30 points after 15 matches. The season record is 9 wins, 1 draws and 5 losses. The goals record is 29 scored and 21 conceded. The stored form sequence is DLDWW.
Husqvarna recorded 8 wins, 1 draws and 1 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LWWWDWWWWW. The averages are 2.30 goals scored and 1.40 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 70% finished with over 2.5 goals. Grebbestad recorded 6 wins, 2 draws and 2 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is DLDWWWWLWW. The averages are 2.10 goals scored and 1.40 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 80% of those matches, while 70% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 3 head-to-head matches, Husqvarna recorded 2 wins, there were 0 draws, and Grebbestad recorded 1 wins. The average total was 3.67 goals per match. Both teams scored in 100% of those matches, while 100% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 0.5 first-half goals — 70%; Over 1.5 goals — 70%; Under 3.5 goals — 70%; Both teams to score — 60%; Over 2.5 goals — 50%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The PMV3 model classifies the leading outcome as Husqvarna to win with 62% confidence. The stored fair probabilities for home, draw and away are 62.19%, 19.90% and 17.91%. The model momentum difference is 44.28 points in favour of Husqvarna. The input data quality score is 96/100. The stored price for the selected market is 1.44 with Bet365. The stored estimated EV is -10.45%. Despite the model probability, the price is marked NO_VALUE. The signal is therefore not treated automatically as a value bet.
The normalized movement for the Asian pair Husqvarna 0 / Grebbestad 0 supports Grebbestad by an average 4.84 percentage points across 1 bookmakers (Bet365) with up to 2 stored observations. This is a market signal, not a result guarantee.
1 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. At least one goal in the match (quota 23, score 80/100, 80.21% group success rate across 662 observations).
The match between Husqvarna and Grebbestad ended 3-2. The game produced 5 goals in total. The first half contained 2 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The previous 3 head-to-head meetings averaged 3.67 goals, while this match produced 5. The final scoring profile differed by more than one goal from that average. Across the previous 3 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was BTTS at 100%. The actual outcome for this indicator was BTTS. The final result aligned with that historical profile. Across the previous 3 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Over 2.5 at 100%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Over 2.5. The final result aligned with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was BTTS. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 3.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result.
The Asian-handicap signal locked before kickoff supported Grebbestad at 0. The stored market movement was 4.84 percentage points across 1 bookmaker. At the final score of 3-2, the line settled as a full loss. The Asian-handicap signal was not confirmed.
The stored Premium market was At least one FT goal with quota 23. The actual market outcome was At least one FT goal. The Premium signal was confirmed.
Of 10 verifiable pre-match indicators, 6 aligned with the final result and 4 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.