Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 08.05.2026 | Lindome - Hestrafor | 2 : 3 |
| 26.09.2025 | Hestrafor - Lindome | 5 : 6 |
| 09.05.2025 | Lindome - Hestrafor | 3 : 1 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29.08.2026 | Hestrafor - Torslanda | 3 - 1 | W |
| 22.08.2026 | Dalstorps - Hestrafor | 2 - 2 | D |
| 14.08.2026 | Hestrafor - Qviding FIF | 2 - 1 | W |
| 08.08.2026 | Västra Frölunda - Hestrafor | 3 - 3 | D |
| 01.08.2026 | Hestrafor - Åstorp | 2 - 1 | W |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28.08.2026 | Lindome - Västra Frölunda | 2 - 1 | W |
| 23.08.2026 | Onsala - Lindome | 1 - 4 | W |
| 14.08.2026 | Lindome - Astrio | 2 - 0 | W |
| 07.08.2026 | Åstorp - Lindome | 0 - 2 | W |
| 31.07.2026 | Lindome - Jonsered | 2 - 3 | L |
The upcoming match between Hestrafor and Lindome is scheduled for 06.09.2026 11:00 in Division 2 - Västra Götaland. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Standings and season form
Hestrafor are in position 5 with 31 points after 15 matches. The season record is 8 wins, 2 draws and 5 losses. The goals record is 31 scored and 26 conceded. The stored form sequence is DWDWW. Lindome are in position 2 with 34 points after 16 matches. The season record is 7 wins, 4 draws and 5 losses. The goals record is 30 scored and 25 conceded. The stored form sequence is WWWWL.
Hestrafor recorded 6 wins, 3 draws and 1 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WDWDWWWLDW. The averages are 2.40 goals scored and 1.50 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 90% of those matches, while 100% finished with over 2.5 goals. Lindome recorded 6 wins, 3 draws and 1 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WWWWLDWWDD. The averages are 2.20 goals scored and 1.10 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 70% of those matches, while 70% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 3 head-to-head matches, Hestrafor recorded 1 wins, there were 0 draws, and Lindome recorded 2 wins. The average total was 6.67 goals per match. Both teams scored in 100% of those matches, while 100% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 1.5 goals — 100%; Both teams to score — 80%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 80%; Over 2.5 goals — 80%; Over 1.5 first-half goals — 50%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The normalized movement for the Asian pair Hestrafor -1.25 / Lindome +1.25 supports Lindome by an average 2.23 percentage points across 2 bookmakers (Bet365, 1xBet) with up to 3 stored observations. This is a market signal, not a result guarantee.
3 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. Both Teams Score — Yes (odds 1.36). At least one goal in the match (quota 34, score 80/100, 79.80% group success rate across 307 observations). Odd/Even — Odd (odds 2).
The match between Hestrafor and Lindome ended 2-0. The game produced 2 goals in total. The first half contained 1 goal. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The previous 3 head-to-head meetings averaged 6.67 goals, while this match produced 2. The final scoring profile differed by more than one goal from that average. Across the previous 3 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was BTTS at 100%. The actual outcome for this indicator was No BTTS. The final result did not align with that historical profile. Across the previous 3 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Over 2.5 at 100%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Under 2.5. The final result did not align with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated BTTS at 80%. The actual outcome was No BTTS. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 100%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Under 2.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
The Asian-handicap signal locked before kickoff supported Lindome at +1.25. The stored market movement was 2.23 percentage points across 2 bookmakers. At the final score of 2-0, the line settled as a full loss. The Asian-handicap signal was not confirmed.
The stored Premium market was BTTS Yes at odds of 1.36. The actual market outcome was BTTS No. The Premium signal was not confirmed. The stored Premium market was At least one FT goal with quota 34. The actual market outcome was At least one FT goal. The Premium signal was confirmed. The stored Premium market was Odd at odds of 2. The actual market outcome was Even. The Premium signal was not confirmed.
Of 11 verifiable pre-match indicators, 3 aligned with the final result and 8 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.