📲 Click here and join our FREE Telegram channel GoalLineExpert App
L W D W W
2
Ykkönen
🏟
✔ Full Time
2
D W W L L

🔁 Head-to-Head

4
1
3
🟢 Rops 🟡 Draws FC jazz 🔴
Date Match Score
16.05.2026 FC jazz - Rops 2 : 1
04.10.2025 Rops - FC jazz 2 : 1
16.08.2025 Rops - FC jazz 0 : 0
08.06.2025 FC jazz - Rops 3 : 1
19.10.2024 FC jazz - Rops 1 : 0
20.07.2024 Rops - FC jazz 3 : 1
12.05.2024 FC jazz - Rops 1 : 4
20.05.2013 FC jazz - Rops 0 : 3

🗓 Latest Matches: Rops

Date Match Score Res
01.08.2026 TPV - Rops 6 - 3 L
25.07.2026 Rops - JJK 4 - 0 W
20.07.2026 KPV-j - Rops 1 - 1 D
10.07.2026 Inter Turku II - Rops 0 - 2 W
05.07.2026 Rops - PKKU 4 - 3 W

📆 Latest Matches: FC jazz

Date Match Score Res
30.07.2026 FC jazz - KuPS Akatemia 2 - 2 D
24.07.2026 FC jazz - TPV 4 - 0 W
18.07.2026 JJK - FC jazz 1 - 3 W
11.07.2026 PKKU - FC jazz 2 - 1 L
02.07.2026 FC jazz - KPV-j 0 - 1 L

Pre-match analysis

This analysis is locked and its content can no longer be changed.

Match context

The upcoming match between Rops and FC jazz is scheduled for 05.08.2026 15:30 in Ykkönen. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.

Standings and season form
Rops are in position 2 with 32 points after 17 matches. The season record is 9 wins, 5 draws and 3 losses. The goals record is 38 scored and 22 conceded. The stored form sequence is LWDWW. FC jazz are in position 8 with 24 points after 17 matches. The season record is 7 wins, 3 draws and 7 losses. The goals record is 24 scored and 25 conceded. The stored form sequence is DWWLL.

Recent results

Rops recorded 5 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LWDWWDWLDW. The averages are 2 goals scored and 1.40 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 40% finished with over 2.5 goals. FC jazz recorded 3 wins, 3 draws and 4 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is DWWLLLDDLW. The averages are 1.50 goals scored and 1.20 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 70% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals.

Head-to-head

Across the last 8 head-to-head matches, Rops recorded 4 wins, there were 1 draws, and FC jazz recorded 3 wins. The average total was 2.88 goals per match. Both teams scored in 62.5% of those matches, while 75% finished with over 2.5 goals.

Trend indicators

The highest stored values are: Over 0.5 first-half goals — 80%; Over 1.5 goals — 80%; Over 2.5 goals — 60%; Both teams to score — 50%; Over 3.5 goals — 50%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.

PMV3 model and market price

The PMV3 model classifies the leading outcome as Rops to win with 65% confidence. The stored fair probabilities for home, draw and away are 65.17%, 18.25% and 16.59%. The model momentum difference is 48.58 points in favour of Rops. The input data quality score is 88/100. The stored price for the selected market is 1.40 with Betfair. The stored estimated EV is -8.77%. Despite the model probability, the price is marked NO_VALUE. The signal is therefore not treated automatically as a value bet.

Premium market signals

2 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. Both Teams Score — Yes (odds 1.36). At least one goal in the match (quota 36, score 92/100, 92.11% group success rate across 38 observations).

Generated: 2026-08-04 17:30:04 · Locked: 2026-08-05 17:10:02

Post-match review

What happened in the match

The match between Rops and FC jazz ended 2-2. The game produced 4 goals in total. The first half contained 3 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.

Comparison with the head-to-head history

The previous 8 head-to-head meetings averaged 2.88 goals, while this match produced 4. The final scoring profile differed by more than one goal from that average. Across the previous 8 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was BTTS at 62.5%. The actual outcome for this indicator was BTTS. The final result aligned with that historical profile. Across the previous 8 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Over 2.5 at 75%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Over 2.5. The final result aligned with that historical profile.

Which pre-match trends were confirmed and which were not

Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result.

Premium market review

The stored Premium market was BTTS Yes at odds of 1.36. The actual market outcome was BTTS Yes. The Premium signal was confirmed. The stored Premium market was At least one FT goal with quota 36. The actual market outcome was At least one FT goal. The Premium signal was confirmed.

Summary

Of 9 verifiable pre-match indicators, 7 aligned with the final result and 2 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.

Added after the match: 2026-08-05 19:22:02
GoalLineExpert Support 🟢 Отговаряме възможно най-бързо
Здравей 👋
Напиши въпроса си тук. Ще получим известие и ще ти отговорим възможно най-бързо.