📲 Click here and join our FREE Telegram channel GoalLineExpert App
D L W D W
2
🏟
✔ Full Time
1
L D D L D

🔁 Head-to-Head

2
3
1
🟢 Rops 🟡 Draws KuPS Akatemia 🔴
Date Match Score
23.08.2025 Rops - KuPS Akatemia 0 : 3
15.06.2025 KuPS Akatemia - Rops 1 : 1
10.08.2024 KuPS Akatemia - Rops 1 : 2
26.05.2024 Rops - KuPS Akatemia 1 : 1
08.10.2023 Rops - KuPS Akatemia 2 : 0
22.07.2023 KuPS Akatemia - Rops 1 : 1

🗓 Latest Matches: Rops

Date Match Score Res
05.08.2026 Rops - FC jazz 2 - 2 D
01.08.2026 TPV - Rops 6 - 3 L
25.07.2026 Rops - JJK 4 - 0 W
20.07.2026 KPV-j - Rops 1 - 1 D
10.07.2026 Inter Turku II - Rops 0 - 2 W

📆 Latest Matches: KuPS Akatemia

Date Match Score Res
07.08.2026 KuPS Akatemia - Inter Turku II 0 - 1 L
30.07.2026 FC jazz - KuPS Akatemia 2 - 2 D
26.07.2026 KuPS Akatemia - VJS 2 - 2 D
18.07.2026 TPV - KuPS Akatemia 3 - 1 L
11.07.2026 JJK - KuPS Akatemia 4 - 4 D

Pre-match analysis

This analysis is locked and its content can no longer be changed.

Match context

The upcoming match between Rops and KuPS Akatemia is scheduled for 11.08.2026 15:30 in Ykkönen. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.

Standings and season form
Rops are in position 2 with 33 points after 18 matches. The season record is 9 wins, 6 draws and 3 losses. The goals record is 40 scored and 24 conceded. The stored form sequence is DLWDW. KuPS Akatemia are in position 12 with 11 points after 18 matches. The season record is 2 wins, 5 draws and 11 losses. The goals record is 29 scored and 42 conceded. The stored form sequence is DDLDL.

Recent results

Rops recorded 4 wins, 4 draws and 2 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is DLWDWWDWLD. The averages are 2.10 goals scored and 1.60 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 50% finished with over 2.5 goals. KuPS Akatemia recorded 1 wins, 4 draws and 5 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LDDLDLDLWL. The averages are 2 goals scored and 2.50 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 80% of those matches, while 90% finished with over 2.5 goals.

Head-to-head

Across the last 6 head-to-head matches, Rops recorded 2 wins, there were 3 draws, and KuPS Akatemia recorded 1 wins. The average total was 2.33 goals per match. Both teams scored in 66.7% of those matches, while 33.3% finished with over 2.5 goals.

Trend indicators

The highest stored values are: Over 0.5 first-half goals — 100%; Over 1.5 goals — 100%; Both teams to score — 80%; Over 2.5 goals — 80%; Over 3.5 goals — 80%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.

PMV3 model and market price

The PMV3 model classifies the leading outcome as Rops to win with 68% confidence. The stored fair probabilities for home, draw and away are 67.89%, 17.67% and 14.44%. The model momentum difference is 53.45 points in favour of Rops. The input data quality score is 88/100. The stored price for the selected market is 1.34 with 1xBet. The stored estimated EV is -9.02%. Despite the model probability, the price is marked NO_VALUE. The signal is therefore not treated automatically as a value bet.

Premium market signals

2 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. Both Teams Score — Yes (odds 1.38). At least one goal in the match (quota 22, score 82/100, 82.21% group success rate across 208 observations).

Generated: 2026-08-10 17:30:03 · Locked: 2026-08-11 17:10:02

Post-match review

What happened in the match

The match between Rops and KuPS Akatemia ended 2-1. The game produced 3 goals in total. The first half contained 1 goal. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.

Comparison with the head-to-head history

The historical profile from 6 head-to-head meetings averaged 2.33 goals, while this match produced 3. The result remained within one goal of the historical average. Across the previous 6 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was BTTS at 66.7%. The actual outcome for this indicator was BTTS. The final result aligned with that historical profile. Across the previous 6 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Under 2.5 at 66.7%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Over 2.5. The final result did not align with that historical profile.

Which pre-match trends were confirmed and which were not

Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated BTTS at 80%. The actual outcome was BTTS. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 100%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 3.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 100%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 HT at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result.

Premium market review

The stored Premium market was BTTS Yes at odds of 1.38. The actual market outcome was BTTS Yes. The Premium signal was confirmed. The stored Premium market was At least one FT goal with quota 22. The actual market outcome was At least one FT goal. The Premium signal was confirmed.

Summary

Of 11 verifiable pre-match indicators, 8 aligned with the final result and 3 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.

Added after the match: 2026-08-11 19:25:02
GoalLineExpert Support 🟢 Отговаряме възможно най-бързо
Здравей 👋
Напиши въпроса си тук. Ще получим известие и ще ти отговорим възможно най-бързо.