Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 09.05.2026 | Nanjing City - Meizhou Kejia | 2 : 0 |
| 21.09.2021 | Meizhou Kejia - Nanjing City | 4 : 2 |
| 03.09.2021 | Nanjing City - Meizhou Kejia | 1 : 2 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06.09.2026 | Shenzhen Juniors - Meizhou Kejia | 5 - 1 | L |
| 30.08.2026 | Ningbo Professional - Meizhou Kejia | 1 - 1 | D |
| 22.08.2026 | Meizhou Kejia - Guangzhou E-Power | 1 - 5 | L |
| 15.08.2026 | Guangxi Hengchen - Meizhou Kejia | 1 - 0 | L |
| 08.08.2026 | Meizhou Kejia - Dongguan United | 3 - 2 | W |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06.09.2026 | Suzhou Dongwu - Nanjing City | 2 - 0 | L |
| 29.08.2026 | Nanjing City - Guangxi Hengchen | 0 - 2 | L |
| 23.08.2026 | Shenzhen Juniors - Nanjing City | 3 - 1 | L |
| 16.08.2026 | Nanjing City - Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 1 - 1 | D |
| 08.08.2026 | Nanjing City - Nantong Zhiyun | 1 - 1 | D |
The upcoming match between Meizhou Kejia and Nanjing City is scheduled for 13.09.2026 11:30 in League One. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Standings and season form
Meizhou Kejia are in position 15 with 12 points after 22 matches. The season record is 6 wins, 3 draws and 13 losses. The goals record is 22 scored and 46 conceded. The stored form sequence is LDLLW. Nanjing City are in position 14 with 21 points after 22 matches. The season record is 5 wins, 6 draws and 11 losses. The goals record is 19 scored and 28 conceded. The stored form sequence is LLLDD.
Meizhou Kejia recorded 2 wins, 1 draws and 7 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LDLLWLLWLL. The averages are 1 goals scored and 2.40 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals. Nanjing City recorded 1 wins, 3 draws and 6 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LLLDDDLLLW. The averages are 0.80 goals scored and 1.60 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 30% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 3 head-to-head matches, Meizhou Kejia recorded 2 wins, there were 0 draws, and Nanjing City recorded 1 wins. The average total was 3.67 goals per match. Both teams scored in 66.7% of those matches, while 66.7% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 0.5 first-half goals — 90%; Over 1.5 goals — 90%; Both teams to score — 70%; Under 2.5 goals — 60%; Under 3.5 goals — 60%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
1 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. Goals Over/Under — Under 2.5 (odds 2).
The discipline profile for Meizhou Kejia at home is based on 6 matches. The team averages 1.17 yellow cards, 0.00 red cards and 1.17 total cards per match. At least 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cards were recorded in 100.0%, 16.7%, 0.0%, 0.0% and 0.0% of those matches respectively, while a red card occurred in 0.0%. Season card data is available for 15 of 22 completed matches (68.2% coverage). The discipline profile for Nanjing City away from home is based on 11 matches. The team averages 2.64 yellow cards, 0.36 red cards and 3.00 total cards per match. At least 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cards were recorded in 100.0%, 72.7%, 45.5%, 36.4% and 18.2% of those matches respectively, while a red card occurred in 36.4%. Season card data is available for 18 of 22 completed matches (81.8% coverage).
The match between Meizhou Kejia and Nanjing City ended 2-1. The game produced 3 goals in total. The first half contained 1 goal. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The historical profile from 3 head-to-head meetings averaged 3.67 goals, while this match produced 3. The result remained within one goal of the historical average. Across the previous 3 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was BTTS at 66.7%. The actual outcome for this indicator was BTTS. The final result aligned with that historical profile. Across the previous 3 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Over 2.5 at 66.7%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Over 2.5. The final result aligned with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated BTTS at 70%. The actual outcome was BTTS. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 90%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 90%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
Before kickoff, the discipline profile for Meizhou Kejia at home was based on 6 matches, with averages of 1.17 yellow cards, 0 red cards and 1.17 total cards per match. In this game, Meizhou Kejia received 0 yellow cards and 0 red cards, 0 in total. That was 1.17 cards below the stored average. In the pre-match sample, 3+ cards occurred in 0% of matches, 5+ in 0%, and a red card in 0%. Before kickoff, the discipline profile for Nanjing City away from home was based on 11 matches, with averages of 2.64 yellow cards, 0.36 red cards and 3 total cards per match. In this game, Nanjing City received 3 yellow cards and 0 red cards, 3 in total. The total was effectively equal to the stored average. In the pre-match sample, 3+ cards occurred in 45.5% of matches, 5+ in 18.2%, and a red card in 36.4%.
The stored Premium market was Under 2.5 at odds of 2. The actual market outcome was Over 2.5. The Premium signal was not confirmed.
Of 10 verifiable pre-match indicators, 8 aligned with the final result and 2 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.