Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 06.04.2026 | Metta / LU - Riga FC II | 2 : 0 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07.09.2026 | Riga FC II - Skanste | 3 - 2 | W |
| 29.08.2026 | JFK Ventspils - Riga FC II | 1 - 1 | D |
| 24.08.2026 | Riga FC II - Riga Mariners | 1 - 3 | L |
| 08.08.2026 | JDFS Alberts - Riga FC II | 2 - 0 | L |
| 01.08.2026 | Riga FC II - Metta / LU | 2 - 2 | D |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05.09.2026 | Valmiera / BSS - Metta / LU | 2 - 2 | D |
| 29.08.2026 | Smiltene - Metta / LU | 0 - 6 | W |
| 23.08.2026 | Rēzekne FA - Metta / LU | 0 - 2 | W |
| 16.08.2026 | Riga - Metta / LU | 4 - 1 | L |
| 08.08.2026 | Metta / LU - Rīgas FS II | 12 - 1 | W |
The upcoming match between Riga FC II and Metta / LU is scheduled for 01.08.2026 16:00 in 1. Liga. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Standings and season form
Riga FC II are in position 8 with 19 points after 14 matches. The season record is 6 wins, 1 draws and 7 losses. The goals record is 21 scored and 26 conceded. The stored form sequence is LWWWW. Metta / LU are in position 1 with 37 points after 14 matches. The season record is 12 wins, 1 draws and 1 losses. The goals record is 55 scored and 11 conceded. The stored form sequence is WWWWW.
Riga FC II recorded 5 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LWWWWLLLLW. The averages are 1.60 goals scored and 1.80 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 70% finished with over 2.5 goals. Metta / LU recorded 9 wins, 1 draws and 0 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WWWWWWWWDW. The averages are 4.60 goals scored and 0.90 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 100% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 1 head-to-head matches, Riga FC II recorded 0 wins, there were 0 draws, and Metta / LU recorded 1 wins. The average total was 2 goals per match. Both teams scored in 0% of those matches, while 0% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 1.5 goals — 100%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 90%; Over 2.5 goals — 80%; Both teams to score — 60%; Over 3.5 goals — 60%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The PMV3 model classifies the leading outcome as Metta / LU to win with 76% confidence. The stored fair probabilities for home, draw and away are 9.99%, 13.83% and 76.18%. The model momentum difference is 66.19 points in favour of Metta / LU. The input data quality score is 94/100. The stored price for the selected market is 1.18 with Bet365. The stored estimated EV is -10.11%. Despite the model probability, the price is marked NO_VALUE. The signal is therefore not treated automatically as a value bet.
The normalized movement for the Asian pair Riga FC II 0 / Metta / LU 0 supports Metta / LU by an average 3.34 percentage points across 1 bookmakers (1xBet) with up to 7 stored observations. This is a market signal, not a result guarantee.
1 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. Both Teams Score — Yes (odds 1.65).
The match between Riga FC II and Metta / LU ended 2-2. The game produced 4 goals in total. The first half contained 1 goal. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was BTTS. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 100%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 3.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 90%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
The Asian-handicap signal locked before kickoff supported Metta / LU at 0. The stored market movement was 3.34 percentage points across 1 bookmaker. At the final score of 2-2, the line settled as a push. The result is neutral and is counted as neither confirmed nor unconfirmed.
The stored Premium market was BTTS Yes at odds of 1.65. The actual market outcome was BTTS Yes. The Premium signal was confirmed.
Of 8 verifiable pre-match indicators, 7 aligned with the final result and 0 were not confirmed, while 1 settled neutrally. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.