Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 19.04.2026 | Riga Mariners - Riga FC II | 2 : 2 |
| 26.07.2025 | Riga Mariners - Riga FC II | 0 : 0 |
| 29.03.2025 | Riga FC II - Riga Mariners | 1 : 1 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08.08.2026 | JDFS Alberts - Riga FC II | 2 - 0 | L |
| 01.08.2026 | Riga FC II - Metta / LU | 2 - 2 | D |
| 27.07.2026 | Valmiera / BSS - Riga FC II | 3 - 0 | L |
| 19.07.2026 | Riga FC II - Super Nova 2 | 2 - 1 | W |
| 04.07.2026 | Riga FC II - Tukums II | 2 - 0 | W |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09.08.2026 | Riga Mariners - Tukums II | 4 - 2 | W |
| 31.07.2026 | Super Nova 2 - Riga Mariners | 0 - 3 | W |
| 25.07.2026 | Riga Mariners - JFK Ventspils | 1 - 1 | D |
| 18.07.2026 | Leevon / PPK - Riga Mariners | 2 - 1 | L |
| 11.07.2026 | Riga Mariners - BFC Daugavpils | 3 - 3 | D |
The upcoming match between Riga FC II and Riga Mariners is scheduled for 24.08.2026 16:00 in 1. Liga. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Standings and season form
Riga FC II are in position 8 with 20 points after 15 matches. The season record is 6 wins, 2 draws and 7 losses. The goals record is 23 scored and 28 conceded. The stored form sequence is LDLWW. Riga Mariners are in position 4 with 35 points after 15 matches. The season record is 9 wins, 5 draws and 1 losses. The goals record is 30 scored and 13 conceded. The stored form sequence is WWDLW.
Riga FC II recorded 4 wins, 1 draws and 5 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LDLWWWWLLL. The averages are 1.40 goals scored and 1.80 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 70% finished with over 2.5 goals. Riga Mariners recorded 7 wins, 2 draws and 1 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WWDLDWWWWW. The averages are 3.20 goals scored and 0.80 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 40% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 3 head-to-head matches, Riga FC II recorded 0 wins, there were 3 draws, and Riga Mariners recorded 0 wins. The average total was 2 goals per match. Both teams scored in 66.7% of those matches, while 33.3% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 1.5 goals — 100%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 90%; Over 2.5 goals — 70%; Under 3.5 goals — 70%; Both teams to score — 50%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The discipline profile for Riga FC II at home is based on 1 matches. The team averages 0.00 yellow cards, 1.00 red cards and 1.00 total cards per match. At least 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cards were recorded in 100.0%, 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.0% and 0.0% of those matches respectively, while a red card occurred in 100.0%. Season card data is available for 2 of 16 completed matches (12.5% coverage). The discipline profile for Riga Mariners away from home is based on 1 matches. The team averages 1.00 yellow cards, 1.00 red cards and 2.00 total cards per match. At least 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cards were recorded in 100.0%, 100.0%, 0.0%, 0.0% and 0.0% of those matches respectively, while a red card occurred in 100.0%. Season card data is available for 1 of 16 completed matches (6.3% coverage).
The match between Riga FC II and Riga Mariners ended 1-3. The game produced 4 goals in total. The first half contained 3 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The previous 3 head-to-head meetings averaged 2 goals, while this match produced 4. The final scoring profile differed by more than one goal from that average. Across the previous 3 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was BTTS at 66.7%. The actual outcome for this indicator was BTTS. The final result aligned with that historical profile. Across the previous 3 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Under 2.5 at 66.7%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Over 2.5. The final result did not align with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 100%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 3.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 90%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result.
Of 8 verifiable pre-match indicators, 4 aligned with the final result and 4 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.