Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 27.05.2026 | Guangzhou Dandelion - Shangyu Pterosaur | 2 : 0 |
| 03.08.2025 | Guangzhou Dandelion - Shangyu Pterosaur | 1 : 0 |
| 25.05.2025 | Shangyu Pterosaur - Guangzhou Dandelion | 0 : 0 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08.08.2026 | Shenzhen 2028 - Shangyu Pterosaur | 6 - 0 | L |
| 01.08.2026 | Shangyu Pterosaur - Langfang Glory City | 1 - 1 | D |
| 25.07.2026 | Guizhou Zhucheng - Shangyu Pterosaur | 3 - 0 | L |
| 18.07.2026 | Xiamen Feilu - Shangyu Pterosaur | 0 - 0 | D |
| 11.07.2026 | Shangyu Pterosaur - Chengdu Rongcheng II | 1 - 1 | D |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08.08.2026 | Xiamen Feilu - Guangzhou Dandelion | 0 - 0 | D |
| 02.08.2026 | Guangzhou Dandelion - Wuhan Three Towns II | 1 - 4 | L |
| 25.07.2026 | Guangzhou Dandelion - Yichun Grand Tiger | 0 - 0 | D |
| 18.07.2026 | Shenzhen 2028 - Guangzhou Dandelion | 3 - 1 | L |
| 12.07.2026 | Guangzhou Dandelion - Langfang Glory City | 1 - 1 | D |
The upcoming match between Shangyu Pterosaur and Guangzhou Dandelion is scheduled for 16.08.2026 11:30 in League Two. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Shangyu Pterosaur recorded 3 wins, 4 draws and 3 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LDLDDDWWLW. The averages are 0.90 goals scored and 1.70 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 30% of those matches, while 30% finished with over 2.5 goals. Guangzhou Dandelion recorded 0 wins, 4 draws and 6 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is DLDLDLLDLL. The averages are 0.60 goals scored and 1.70 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 40% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 3 head-to-head matches, Shangyu Pterosaur recorded 0 wins, there were 1 draws, and Guangzhou Dandelion recorded 2 wins. The average total was 1 goals per match. Both teams scored in 0% of those matches, while 0% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 1.5 goals — 70%; Under 3.5 goals — 70%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 60%; Under 2.5 goals — 60%; Both teams to score — 50%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
1 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. Odd/Even — Odd (odds 2.02).
The discipline profile for Shangyu Pterosaur at home is based on 7 matches. The team averages 2.86 yellow cards, 0.00 red cards and 2.86 total cards per match. At least 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cards were recorded in 100.0%, 100.0%, 71.4%, 14.3% and 0.0% of those matches respectively, while a red card occurred in 0.0%. Season card data is available for 14 of 20 completed matches (70.0% coverage). The discipline profile for Guangzhou Dandelion away from home is based on 5 matches. The team averages 1.60 yellow cards, 0.00 red cards and 1.60 total cards per match. At least 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cards were recorded in 100.0%, 40.0%, 20.0%, 0.0% and 0.0% of those matches respectively, while a red card occurred in 0.0%. Season card data is available for 12 of 20 completed matches (60.0% coverage).
The match between Shangyu Pterosaur and Guangzhou Dandelion ended 1-3. The game produced 4 goals in total. The first half contained 2 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The previous 3 head-to-head meetings averaged 1 goals, while this match produced 4. The final scoring profile differed by more than one goal from that average. Across the previous 3 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was No BTTS at 100%. The actual outcome for this indicator was BTTS. The final result did not align with that historical profile. Across the previous 3 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Under 2.5 at 100%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Over 2.5. The final result did not align with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 3.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result.
The stored Premium market was Odd at odds of 2.02. The actual market outcome was Even. The Premium signal was not confirmed.
Of 9 verifiable pre-match indicators, 2 aligned with the final result and 7 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.