Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 03.05.2026 | Tver - Chertanovo Moscow | 0 : 2 |
| 12.10.2025 | Chertanovo Moscow - Tver | 1 : 1 |
| 22.06.2025 | Tver - Chertanovo Moscow | 2 : 2 |
| 22.09.2024 | Chertanovo Moscow - Tver | 2 : 1 |
| 07.06.2024 | Tver - Chertanovo Moscow | 1 : 3 |
| 01.10.2022 | Chertanovo Moscow - Tver | 0 : 0 |
| 06.08.2022 | Tver - Chertanovo Moscow | 0 : 2 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15.08.2026 | Iskra Smolensk - Chertanovo Moscow | 0 - 3 | W |
| 12.08.2026 | Chita - Chertanovo Moscow | 0 - 0 | D |
| 09.08.2026 | Chertanovo Moscow - Murom | 1 - 2 | L |
| 02.08.2026 | Luki-Energiya - Chertanovo Moscow | 3 - 2 | L |
| 26.07.2026 | Chertanovo Moscow - Zvezda St. Petersburg | 1 - 1 | D |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16.08.2026 | Tver - Kosmos Dolgoprudny | 1 - 0 | W |
| 13.08.2026 | Dinamo Vologda - Tver | 2 - 0 | L |
| 08.08.2026 | Dinamo St. Petersburg - Tver | 3 - 2 | L |
| 02.08.2026 | Tver - Cherepovets | 5 - 0 | W |
| 04.07.2026 | Iskra Smolensk - Tver | 2 - 4 | W |
The upcoming match between Chertanovo Moscow and Tver is scheduled for 23.08.2026 16:00 in Second League - Group 2. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Standings and season form
Chertanovo Moscow are in position 5 with 32 points after 16 matches. The season record is 8 wins, 5 draws and 3 losses. The goals record is 28 scored and 15 conceded. The stored form sequence is WLLDD. Tver are in position 8 with 22 points after 16 matches. The season record is 6 wins, 1 draws and 9 losses. The goals record is 25 scored and 27 conceded. The stored form sequence is WLWWW.
Chertanovo Moscow recorded 4 wins, 3 draws and 3 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WLLDDDWWWL. The averages are 1.80 goals scored and 1.10 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 70% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals. Tver recorded 5 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WLLWWWLLLW. The averages are 1.80 goals scored and 1.50 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 7 head-to-head matches, Chertanovo Moscow recorded 4 wins, there were 3 draws, and Tver recorded 0 wins. The average total was 2.43 goals per match. Both teams scored in 57.1% of those matches, while 42.9% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 1.5 goals — 90%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 80%; Both teams to score — 60%; Over 2.5 goals — 60%; Under 3.5 goals — 60%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
2 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. Goals Over/Under — Under 2.5 (odds 1.90). Goals Over/Under — Over 1.5 (odds 1.24, score 80/100, 80.34% bucket win rate across 117 observations).
The discipline profile for Tver away from home is based on 1 matches. The team averages 2.00 yellow cards, 2.00 red cards and 4.00 total cards per match. At least 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cards were recorded in 100.0%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 100.0% and 0.0% of those matches respectively, while a red card occurred in 100.0%. Season card data is available for 2 of 18 completed matches (11.1% coverage).
The match between Chertanovo Moscow and Tver ended 4-0. The game produced 4 goals in total. The first half contained 2 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The previous 7 head-to-head meetings averaged 2.43 goals, while this match produced 4. The final scoring profile differed by more than one goal from that average. Across the previous 7 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was BTTS at 57.1%. The actual outcome for this indicator was No BTTS. The final result did not align with that historical profile. Across the previous 7 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Under 2.5 at 57.1%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Over 2.5. The final result did not align with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was No BTTS. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 90%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 3.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result.
The stored Premium market was Under 2.5 at odds of 1.9. The actual market outcome was Over 2.5. The Premium signal was not confirmed. The stored Premium market was Over 1.5 FT at odds of 1.24. The actual market outcome was Over 1.5 FT. The Premium signal was confirmed.
Of 11 verifiable pre-match indicators, 4 aligned with the final result and 7 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.