Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 16.08.2026 | Liverpool - Como | 2 : 0 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16.08.2026 | Liverpool - Como | 2 - 0 | W |
| 09.08.2026 | Liverpool - Monaco | 2 - 3 | L |
| 02.08.2026 | Liverpool - Leeds | 2 - 4 | L |
| 29.07.2026 | Liverpool - Wrexham | 1 - 0 | W |
| 25.07.2026 | Liverpool - Sunderland | 4 - 2 | W |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16.08.2026 | Liverpool - Como | 2 - 0 | L |
| 12.08.2026 | Arsenal - Como | 1 - 1 | D |
| 31.07.2026 | Famalicao - Como | 2 - 3 | W |
| 24.05.2026 | Cremonese - Como | 1 - 4 | W |
| 17.05.2026 | Como - Parma | 1 - 0 | W |
The upcoming match between Liverpool and Como is scheduled for 16.08.2026 10:30 in Friendlies Clubs. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Liverpool recorded 4 wins, 2 draws and 4 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LLWWDLDLWW. The averages are 2 goals scored and 2 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 90% of those matches, while 70% finished with over 2.5 goals. Como recorded 5 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is DWWWWDWLLL. The averages are 1.80 goals scored and 1.30 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 50% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Both teams to score — 80%; Over 1.5 goals — 80%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 70%; Over 2.5 goals — 70%; Over 3.5 goals — 70%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
1 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. Odd/Even — Odd (odds 2).
The match between Liverpool and Como ended 0-0. The game produced 0 goals in total. The first half contained 0 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated BTTS at 80%. The actual outcome was No BTTS. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 2.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 3.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 0.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result.
The stored Premium market was Odd at odds of 2. The actual market outcome was Even. The Premium signal was not confirmed.
Of 7 verifiable pre-match indicators, 0 aligned with the final result and 7 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.