Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 25.11.2025 | Žilina - Skalica | 3 : 1 |
| 25.10.2025 | Žilina - Skalica | 3 : 2 |
| 27.07.2025 | Skalica - Žilina | 0 : 0 |
| 15.12.2024 | Skalica - Žilina | 0 : 0 |
| 14.09.2024 | Žilina - Skalica | 3 : 2 |
| 17.02.2024 | Skalica - Žilina | 1 : 1 |
| 29.09.2023 | Žilina - Skalica | 5 : 3 |
| 11.02.2023 | Žilina - Skalica | 1 : 0 |
| 30.08.2022 | Skalica - Žilina | 1 : 0 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02.08.2026 | Zemplín Michalovce - Žilina | 0 - 1 | W |
| 30.07.2026 | GKS Katowice - Žilina | 3 - 1 | L |
| 26.07.2026 | Žilina - FK Košice | 4 - 4 | D |
| 23.07.2026 | Žilina - GKS Katowice | 2 - 1 | W |
| 16.07.2026 | Žilina - HNK Hajduk Split | 2 - 1 | W |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01.08.2026 | Skalica - Ružomberok | 2 - 1 | W |
| 25.07.2026 | Spartak Trnava - Skalica | 1 - 1 | D |
| 18.07.2026 | Slovácko - Skalica | 1 - 3 | W |
| 10.07.2026 | Spartak Trnava - Skalica | - | |
| 04.07.2026 | Petržalka - Skalica | 1 - 0 | L |
The upcoming match between Žilina and Skalica is scheduled for 09.08.2026 15:00 in Super Liga. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Žilina recorded 3 wins, 4 draws and 3 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WLDWWLDDLD. The averages are 1.40 goals scored and 1.90 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 70% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals. Skalica recorded 6 wins, 2 draws and 2 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WDWLDWWLWW. The averages are 1.40 goals scored and 0.90 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 50% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 9 head-to-head matches, Žilina recorded 5 wins, there were 3 draws, and Skalica recorded 1 wins. The average total was 2.89 goals per match. Both teams scored in 55.6% of those matches, while 44.4% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Both teams to score — 80%; Over 1.5 goals — 80%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 70%; Over 2.5 goals — 70%; Under 3.5 goals — 70%. The stored corner indicators are: average total corners — 10; over 7.5 corners — 100%; over 8.5 corners — 100%; over 9.5 corners — 100%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The PMV3 model classifies the leading outcome as Žilina or draw (1X) with 83% confidence. The stored fair probabilities for home, draw and away are 57.92%, 25.02% and 17.06%. The model momentum difference is 40.86 points in favour of Žilina. The input data quality score is 99/100. The stored price for the selected market is 1.12 with Bet365. The stored estimated EV is -7.11%. Despite the model probability, the price is marked NO_VALUE. The signal is therefore not treated automatically as a value bet.
The normalized movement for the Asian pair Žilina 0 / Skalica 0 supports Žilina by an average 1.75 percentage points across 3 bookmakers (Pinnacle, Bet365, 1xBet) with up to 17 stored observations. This is a market signal, not a result guarantee.
The match between Žilina and Skalica ended 1-3. The game produced 4 goals in total. The first half contained 1 goal. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The previous 9 head-to-head meetings averaged 2.89 goals, while this match produced 4. The final scoring profile differed by more than one goal from that average. Across the previous 9 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was BTTS at 55.6%. The actual outcome for this indicator was BTTS. The final result aligned with that historical profile. Across the previous 9 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Under 2.5 at 55.6%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Over 2.5. The final result did not align with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated BTTS at 80%. The actual outcome was BTTS. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 3.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result.
The Asian-handicap signal locked before kickoff supported Žilina at 0. The stored market movement was 1.75 percentage points across 3 bookmakers. At the final score of 1-3, the line settled as a full loss. The Asian-handicap signal was not confirmed.
Of 10 verifiable pre-match indicators, 5 aligned with the final result and 5 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.