Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 11.09.2026 | Montpellier - PAU | 1 : 0 |
| 20.03.2026 | PAU - Montpellier | 0 : 0 |
| 06.12.2025 | Montpellier - PAU | 0 : 1 |
| 06.01.2023 | PAU - Montpellier | 2 : 1 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11.09.2026 | Montpellier - PAU | 1 - 0 | W |
| 05.09.2026 | Saint Etienne - Montpellier | 3 - 1 | L |
| 28.08.2026 | Montpellier - Boulogne | 0 - 0 | D |
| 21.08.2026 | Dunkerque - Montpellier | 0 - 1 | W |
| 14.08.2026 | Nancy - Montpellier | 0 - 1 | W |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11.09.2026 | Montpellier - PAU | 1 - 0 | L |
| 04.09.2026 | PAU - Sochaux | 1 - 1 | D |
| 28.08.2026 | Rodez - PAU | 2 - 2 | D |
| 21.08.2026 | PAU - Nancy | 0 - 1 | L |
| 14.08.2026 | Dijon - PAU | 0 - 1 | W |
The upcoming match between Montpellier and PAU is scheduled for 11.09.2026 18:00 in Ligue 2. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Standings and season form
Montpellier are in position 5 with 8 points after 5 matches. The season record is 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 losses. The goals record is 4 scored and 4 conceded. The stored form sequence is LDWWD. PAU are in position 12 with 5 points after 5 matches. The season record is 1 wins, 2 draws and 2 losses. The goals record is 4 scored and 5 conceded. The stored form sequence is DDLWL.
Montpellier recorded 6 wins, 2 draws and 2 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LDWWDWWLWW. The averages are 2 goals scored and 1.40 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 50% finished with over 2.5 goals. PAU recorded 1 wins, 2 draws and 7 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is DDLWLLLLLL. The averages are 0.90 goals scored and 2.30 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 3 head-to-head matches, Montpellier recorded 0 wins, there were 1 draws, and PAU recorded 2 wins. The average total was 1.33 goals per match. Both teams scored in 33.3% of those matches, while 33.3% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Under 2.5 goals — 80%; Under 3.5 goals — 80%; Both teams to score — 40%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 40%; Over 1.5 goals — 40%. The stored corner indicators are: average total corners — 8.53; over 7.5 corners — 100%; over 8.5 corners — 100%; over 9.5 corners — 90%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The normalized movement for the Asian pair Montpellier -0.75 / PAU +0.75 supports Montpellier by an average 1.57 percentage points across 2 bookmakers (Bet365, 1xBet) with up to 9 stored observations. This is a market signal, not a result guarantee.
1 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. Odd/Even — Odd (odds 2).
The discipline profile for Montpellier at home is based on 2 matches. The team averages 2.50 yellow cards, 0.00 red cards and 2.50 total cards per match. At least 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cards were recorded in 100.0%, 100.0%, 50.0%, 0.0% and 0.0% of those matches respectively, while a red card occurred in 0.0%. Season card data is available for 5 of 5 completed matches (100.0% coverage). The discipline profile for PAU away from home is based on 2 matches. The team averages 2.00 yellow cards, 0.00 red cards and 2.00 total cards per match. At least 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cards were recorded in 100.0%, 100.0%, 0.0%, 0.0% and 0.0% of those matches respectively, while a red card occurred in 0.0%. Season card data is available for 5 of 5 completed matches (100.0% coverage).
The match between Montpellier and PAU ended 1-0. The game produced 1 goal in total. The first half contained 0 goals. The verified final statistics recorded 9 corners in total. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The historical profile from 3 head-to-head meetings averaged 1.33 goals, while this match produced 1. The result remained within one goal of the historical average. Across the previous 3 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was No BTTS at 66.7%. The actual outcome for this indicator was No BTTS. The final result aligned with that historical profile. Across the previous 3 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Under 2.5 at 66.7%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Under 2.5. The final result aligned with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated No BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was No BTTS. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 2.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Under 2.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. The stored pre-match average was 8.53 total corners. The match recorded 9 corners in total. The result remained within one corner of the stored average. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 7.5 corners at 100%. The actual outcome was Over 7.5 corners. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 8.5 corners at 100%. The actual outcome was Over 8.5 corners. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 9.5 corners at 90%. The actual outcome was Under 9.5 corners. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 0.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 80%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
Before kickoff, the discipline profile for Montpellier at home was based on 2 matches, with averages of 2.5 yellow cards, 0 red cards and 2.5 total cards per match. In this game, Montpellier received 2 yellow cards and 0 red cards, 2 in total. That was 0.5 cards below the stored average. In the pre-match sample, 3+ cards occurred in 50% of matches, 5+ in 0%, and a red card in 0%. Before kickoff, the discipline profile for PAU away from home was based on 2 matches, with averages of 2 yellow cards, 0 red cards and 2 total cards per match. In this game, PAU received 3 yellow cards and 0 red cards, 3 in total. That was 1 cards above the stored average. In the pre-match sample, 3+ cards occurred in 0% of matches, 5+ in 0%, and a red card in 0%.
The Asian-handicap signal locked before kickoff supported Montpellier at -0.75. The stored market movement was 1.57 percentage points across 2 bookmakers. At the final score of 1-0, the line settled as a half win. The Asian-handicap signal was confirmed.
The stored Premium market was Odd at odds of 2. The actual market outcome was Odd. The Premium signal was confirmed.
Of 14 verifiable pre-match indicators, 13 aligned with the final result and 1 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.