Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22.08.2026 | Teteks - FK Rabotnicki | - | |
| 15.08.2026 | FK Rabotnicki - Kozuv Gevgelija | 3 - 0 | W |
| 09.08.2026 | Belasica - FK Rabotnicki | 1 - 0 | L |
| 25.05.2026 | FK Rabotnicki - Tikveš | 1 - 3 | L |
| 16.05.2026 | Shkupi 1927 - FK Rabotnicki | 0 - 7 | W |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22.08.2026 | Kozuv Gevgelija - Shkupi 1927 | 2 - 0 | W |
| 15.08.2026 | FK Rabotnicki - Kozuv Gevgelija | 3 - 0 | L |
| 08.08.2026 | Kozuv Gevgelija - Detonit Plachkovica | 0 - 0 | D |
| 01.08.2026 | Kozuv Gevgelija - Akademija Pandev | 0 - 0 | D |
| 29.07.2026 | Belasica - Kozuv Gevgelija | 0 - 0 | D |
The upcoming match between FK Rabotnicki and Kozuv Gevgelija is scheduled for 15.08.2026 15:00 in Second League. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
FK Rabotnicki recorded 3 wins, 2 draws and 5 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LLWDDLWLLW. The averages are 1.80 goals scored and 1.60 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 70% finished with over 2.5 goals. Kozuv Gevgelija recorded 4 wins, 2 draws and 4 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LLWWLWDLDW. The averages are 2.30 goals scored and 1 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 20% of those matches, while 50% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 1.5 goals — 80%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 70%; Over 1.5 first-half goals — 70%; Over 2.5 goals — 70%; Over 3.5 goals — 60%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The match between FK Rabotnicki and Kozuv Gevgelija ended 3-0. The game produced 3 goals in total. The first half contained 1 goal. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated No BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was No BTTS. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 3.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 HT at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result.
Of 6 verifiable pre-match indicators, 4 aligned with the final result and 2 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.