Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 23.02.2026 | Maccabi Netanya - Beitar Jerusalem | 2 : 8 |
| 30.11.2025 | Beitar Jerusalem - Maccabi Netanya | 4 : 2 |
| 04.05.2025 | Beitar Jerusalem - Maccabi Netanya | 0 : 3 |
| 30.03.2025 | Maccabi Netanya - Beitar Jerusalem | 0 : 1 |
| 01.01.2025 | Maccabi Netanya - Beitar Jerusalem | 3 : 0 |
| 15.09.2024 | Beitar Jerusalem - Maccabi Netanya | 2 : 0 |
| 10.08.2024 | Maccabi Netanya - Beitar Jerusalem | 1 : 1 |
| 31.03.2024 | Maccabi Netanya - Beitar Jerusalem | 0 : 3 |
| 24.02.2024 | Beitar Jerusalem - Maccabi Netanya | 0 : 0 |
| 20.12.2023 | Maccabi Netanya - Beitar Jerusalem | 0 : 3 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17.08.2026 | Hapoel Ramat Gan - Beitar Jerusalem | 3 - 3 | D |
| 13.08.2026 | Austria Vienna - Beitar Jerusalem | 1 - 2 | W |
| 06.08.2026 | Beitar Jerusalem - Austria Vienna | 1 - 2 | L |
| 30.07.2026 | Beitar Jerusalem - AEK Larnaca | 2 - 3 | L |
| 23.07.2026 | AEK Larnaca - Beitar Jerusalem | 0 - 1 | W |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24.08.2026 | Maccabi Netanya - Bnei Sakhnin | 0 - 0 | D |
| 16.08.2026 | Maccabi Netanya - Maccabi Tel Aviv | 0 - 1 | L |
| 05.08.2026 | Hapoel Petah Tikva - Maccabi Netanya | 0 - 2 | W |
| 02.08.2026 | Maccabi Netanya - Hapoel Ramat Gan | 2 - 3 | L |
| 29.07.2026 | Maccabi Petah Tikva - Maccabi Netanya | 1 - 2 | W |
The upcoming match between Beitar Jerusalem and Maccabi Netanya is scheduled for 29.08.2026 17:30 in Ligat Ha'al. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Beitar Jerusalem recorded 2 wins, 6 draws and 2 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is DWLLWDDDDD. The averages are 1.40 goals scored and 1.40 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 70% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals. Maccabi Netanya recorded 6 wins, 2 draws and 2 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is DLWLWWWWWD. The averages are 1.90 goals scored and 1 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 50% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 10 head-to-head matches, Beitar Jerusalem recorded 6 wins, there were 2 draws, and Maccabi Netanya recorded 2 wins. The average total was 3.30 goals per match. Both teams scored in 30% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Under 3.5 goals — 70%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 60%; Over 1.5 goals — 60%; Both teams to score — 50%; Over 2.5 goals — 50%. The stored corner indicators are: average total corners — 7.90; over 7.5 corners — 100%; over 8.5 corners — 93%; over 9.5 corners — 83%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The PMV3 model classifies the leading outcome as Beitar Jerusalem to win with 63% confidence. The stored fair probabilities for home, draw and away are 62.76%, 21.74% and 15.50%. The model momentum difference is 47.26 points in favour of Beitar Jerusalem. The input data quality score is 86/100. The stored price for the selected market is 1.42 with Bet365. The stored estimated EV is -10.88%. Despite the model probability, the price is marked NO_VALUE. The signal is therefore not treated automatically as a value bet.
The normalized movement for the Asian pair Beitar Jerusalem -0.25 / Maccabi Netanya +0.25 supports Maccabi Netanya by an average 1.15 percentage points across 2 bookmakers (Bet365, 1xBet) with up to 6 stored observations. This is a market signal, not a result guarantee.
1 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. At least one goal in the match (quota 19, score 82/100, 81.53% group success rate across 1440 observations).
The match between Beitar Jerusalem and Maccabi Netanya ended 1-4. The game produced 5 goals in total. The first half contained 0 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The previous 10 head-to-head meetings averaged 3.3 goals, while this match produced 5. The final scoring profile differed by more than one goal from that average. Across the previous 10 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was No BTTS at 70%. The actual outcome for this indicator was BTTS. The final result did not align with that historical profile. Across the previous 10 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Over 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Over 2.5. The final result aligned with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 3.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 0.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
The Asian-handicap signal locked before kickoff supported Maccabi Netanya at +0.25. The stored market movement was 1.15 percentage points across 2 bookmakers. At the final score of 1-4, the line settled as a full win. The Asian-handicap signal was confirmed.
The stored Premium market was At least one FT goal with quota 19. The actual market outcome was At least one FT goal. The Premium signal was confirmed.
Of 9 verifiable pre-match indicators, 5 aligned with the final result and 4 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.