Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 17.03.2026 | BFA - FA Šiauliai II | 1 : 0 |
| 23.08.2025 | BFA - FA Šiauliai II | 5 : 1 |
| 27.04.2025 | FA Šiauliai II - BFA | 0 : 4 |
| 03.11.2024 | FA Šiauliai II - BFA | 1 : 3 |
| 16.06.2024 | BFA - FA Šiauliai II | 7 : 0 |
| 05.11.2023 | FA Šiauliai II - BFA | 4 : 2 |
| 25.06.2023 | BFA - FA Šiauliai II | 2 : 1 |
| 18.09.2022 | BFA - FA Šiauliai II | 5 : 1 |
| 21.05.2022 | FA Šiauliai II - BFA | 0 : 3 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04.09.2026 | Hegelmann II - FA Šiauliai II | 5 - 1 | L |
| 28.08.2026 | FA Šiauliai II - Minija | 1 - 2 | L |
| 21.08.2026 | Jonava - FA Šiauliai II | 0 - 1 | W |
| 14.08.2026 | FA Šiauliai II - Žalgiris II | 1 - 4 | L |
| 08.08.2026 | Atmosfera - FA Šiauliai II | 1 - 1 | D |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04.09.2026 | BFA - Babrungas | 2 - 1 | W |
| 28.08.2026 | Tauras - BFA | 2 - 2 | D |
| 22.08.2026 | BFA - Neptūną Klaipėda | 2 - 0 | W |
| 15.08.2026 | Dainava - BFA | 0 - 0 | D |
| 08.08.2026 | BFA - Transinvest 2 | 4 - 2 | W |
The upcoming match between FA Šiauliai II and BFA is scheduled for 02.08.2026 14:00 in 1 Lyga. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Standings and season form
FA Šiauliai II are in position 16 with 7 points after 17 matches. The season record is 1 wins, 4 draws and 12 losses. The goals record is 15 scored and 40 conceded. The stored form sequence is LLLLL. BFA are in position 7 with 28 points after 17 matches. The season record is 9 wins, 1 draws and 7 losses. The goals record is 25 scored and 26 conceded. The stored form sequence is WWWWL.
FA Šiauliai II recorded 0 wins, 2 draws and 8 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LLLLLLDLDL. The averages are 0.90 goals scored and 2.60 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 70% of those matches, while 70% finished with over 2.5 goals. BFA recorded 7 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WWWWLLLWWW. The averages are 1.80 goals scored and 1.30 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 40% of those matches, while 70% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 9 head-to-head matches, FA Šiauliai II recorded 1 wins, there were 0 draws, and BFA recorded 8 wins. The average total was 4.44 goals per match. Both teams scored in 55.6% of those matches, while 88.9% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 0.5 first-half goals — 100%; Over 1.5 goals — 80%; Over 2.5 goals — 80%; Both teams to score — 60%; Over 3.5 goals — 60%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The PMV3 model classifies the leading outcome as BFA to win with 62% confidence. The stored fair probabilities for home, draw and away are 17.85%, 20.61% and 61.54%. The model momentum difference is 43.70 points in favour of BFA. The input data quality score is 92/100. The stored price for the selected market is 1.45 with Bet365. The stored estimated EV is -10.76%. Despite the model probability, the price is marked NO_VALUE. The signal is therefore not treated automatically as a value bet.
The normalized movement for the Asian pair FA Šiauliai II 0 / BFA 0 supports BFA by an average 2.48 percentage points across 1 bookmakers (1xBet) with up to 2 stored observations. This is a market signal, not a result guarantee.
2 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. Both Teams Score — Yes (odds 1.55). At least one goal in the match (quota 18, score 88/100, 87.50% group success rate across 56 observations).
The match between FA Šiauliai II and BFA ended 1-0. The game produced 1 goal in total. The first half contained 1 goal. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The previous 9 head-to-head meetings averaged 4.44 goals, while this match produced 1. The final scoring profile differed by more than one goal from that average. Across the previous 9 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was BTTS at 55.6%. The actual outcome for this indicator was No BTTS. The final result did not align with that historical profile. Across the previous 9 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Over 2.5 at 88.9%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Under 2.5. The final result did not align with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was No BTTS. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Under 2.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 3.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 100%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
The Asian-handicap signal locked before kickoff supported BFA at 0. The stored market movement was 2.48 percentage points across 1 bookmaker. At the final score of 1-0, the line settled as a full loss. The Asian-handicap signal was not confirmed.
The stored Premium market was BTTS Yes at odds of 1.55. The actual market outcome was BTTS No. The Premium signal was not confirmed. The stored Premium market was At least one FT goal with quota 18. The actual market outcome was At least one FT goal. The Premium signal was confirmed.
Of 12 verifiable pre-match indicators, 3 aligned with the final result and 9 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.