Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 18.04.2026 | Garliava - Be1 NFA | 2 : 2 |
| 28.09.2024 | Garliava - Be1 NFA | 2 : 2 |
| 11.05.2024 | Be1 NFA - Garliava | 2 : 1 |
| 12.08.2023 | Garliava - Be1 NFA | 0 : 3 |
| 06.05.2023 | Garliava - Be1 NFA | 1 : 2 |
| 26.03.2023 | Be1 NFA - Garliava | 1 : 1 |
| 13.08.2022 | Garliava - Be1 NFA | 2 : 1 |
| 02.04.2022 | Be1 NFA - Garliava | 1 : 0 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14.08.2026 | Be1 NFA - Hegelmann II | 2 - 1 | W |
| 08.08.2026 | Minija - Be1 NFA | 3 - 0 | L |
| 31.07.2026 | Be1 NFA - Jonava | 0 - 2 | L |
| 26.07.2026 | BFA - Be1 NFA | 3 - 1 | L |
| 01.07.2026 | Atmosfera - Be1 NFA | 0 - 1 | W |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15.08.2026 | Garliava - Tauras | 0 - 1 | L |
| 07.08.2026 | Hegelmann II - Garliava | 3 - 1 | L |
| 01.08.2026 | Garliava - Neptūną Klaipėda | 0 - 1 | L |
| 25.07.2026 | Jonava - Garliava | 1 - 0 | L |
| 26.06.2026 | Garliava - Minija | 0 - 1 | L |
The upcoming match between Be1 NFA and Garliava is scheduled for 21.08.2026 15:30 in 1 Lyga. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Standings and season form
Be1 NFA are in position 6 with 35 points after 17 matches. The season record is 10 wins, 2 draws and 5 losses. The goals record is 29 scored and 20 conceded. The stored form sequence is WLLLW. Garliava are in position 11 with 22 points after 18 matches. The season record is 6 wins, 4 draws and 8 losses. The goals record is 23 scored and 19 conceded. The stored form sequence is LLLLL.
Be1 NFA recorded 5 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WLLLWWLWLW. The averages are 0.90 goals scored and 1.30 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 40% of those matches, while 50% finished with over 2.5 goals. Garliava recorded 1 wins, 2 draws and 7 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LLLLLWLLDD. The averages are 0.70 goals scored and 1.20 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 40% of those matches, while 30% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 8 head-to-head matches, Be1 NFA recorded 4 wins, there were 3 draws, and Garliava recorded 1 wins. The average total was 2.88 goals per match. Both teams scored in 75% of those matches, while 75% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 0.5 first-half goals — 80%; Under 3.5 goals — 80%; Over 1.5 goals — 60%; Over 2.5 goals — 50%; Under 2.5 goals — 50%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
1 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. At least one goal in the match (quota 18, score 86/100, 85.71% group success rate across 63 observations).
The discipline profile for Be1 NFA at home is based on 1 matches. The team averages 0.00 yellow cards, 1.00 red cards and 1.00 total cards per match. At least 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cards were recorded in 100.0%, 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.0% and 0.0% of those matches respectively, while a red card occurred in 100.0%. Season card data is available for 1 of 19 completed matches (5.3% coverage). The discipline profile for Garliava away from home is based on 1 matches. The team averages 1.00 yellow cards, 1.00 red cards and 2.00 total cards per match. At least 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cards were recorded in 100.0%, 100.0%, 0.0%, 0.0% and 0.0% of those matches respectively, while a red card occurred in 100.0%. Season card data is available for 2 of 19 completed matches (10.5% coverage).
The match between Be1 NFA and Garliava ended 2-0. The game produced 2 goals in total. The first half contained 2 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The historical profile from 8 head-to-head meetings averaged 2.88 goals, while this match produced 2. The result remained within one goal of the historical average. Across the previous 8 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was BTTS at 75%. The actual outcome for this indicator was No BTTS. The final result did not align with that historical profile. Across the previous 8 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Over 2.5 at 75%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Under 2.5. The final result did not align with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated No BTTS at 70%. The actual outcome was No BTTS. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 90%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result.
The stored Premium market was At least one FT goal with quota 18. The actual market outcome was At least one FT goal. The Premium signal was confirmed.
Of 9 verifiable pre-match indicators, 6 aligned with the final result and 3 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.