Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 19.04.2026 | FA Šiauliai II - Jonava | 2 : 2 |
| 26.09.2025 | FA Šiauliai II - Jonava | 0 : 3 |
| 24.05.2025 | Jonava - FA Šiauliai II | 3 : 1 |
| 26.08.2023 | FA Šiauliai II - Jonava | 3 : 2 |
| 07.04.2023 | Jonava - FA Šiauliai II | 0 : 2 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14.08.2026 | Kauno Žalgiris II - Jonava | 2 - 1 | L |
| 07.08.2026 | Jonava - Ekranas | 1 - 2 | L |
| 31.07.2026 | Be1 NFA - Jonava | 0 - 2 | W |
| 25.07.2026 | Jonava - Garliava | 1 - 0 | W |
| 18.07.2026 | Minija - Jonava | 2 - 1 | L |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14.08.2026 | FA Šiauliai II - Žalgiris II | 1 - 4 | L |
| 08.08.2026 | Atmosfera - FA Šiauliai II | 1 - 1 | D |
| 02.08.2026 | FA Šiauliai II - BFA | 1 - 0 | W |
| 25.07.2026 | Neptūną Klaipėda - FA Šiauliai II | 2 - 1 | L |
| 19.07.2026 | Tauras - FA Šiauliai II | 3 - 1 | L |
The upcoming match between Jonava and FA Šiauliai II is scheduled for 21.08.2026 16:00 in 1 Lyga. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Standings and season form
Jonava are in position 10 with 23 points after 19 matches. The season record is 6 wins, 5 draws and 8 losses. The goals record is 23 scored and 24 conceded. The stored form sequence is LLWWL. FA Šiauliai II are in position 16 with 11 points after 18 matches. The season record is 2 wins, 4 draws and 12 losses. The goals record is 16 scored and 40 conceded. The stored form sequence is LDWLL.
Jonava recorded 3 wins, 2 draws and 5 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LLWWLLWDDL. The averages are 1 goals scored and 1.10 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 50% finished with over 2.5 goals. FA Šiauliai II recorded 1 wins, 2 draws and 7 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LDWLLLLLLD. The averages are 0.80 goals scored and 2.20 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 70% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 5 head-to-head matches, Jonava recorded 2 wins, there were 1 draws, and FA Šiauliai II recorded 2 wins. The average total was 3.60 goals per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 80% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 0.5 first-half goals — 80%; Over 1.5 goals — 80%; Under 3.5 goals — 80%; Both teams to score — 70%; Over 2.5 goals — 60%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The PMV3 model classifies the leading outcome as Jonava to win with 61% confidence. The stored fair probabilities for home, draw and away are 60.67%, 21.38% and 17.96%. The model momentum difference is 42.71 points in favour of Jonava. The input data quality score is 96/100. The stored price for the selected market is 1.48 with Bet365. The stored estimated EV is -10.21%. Despite the model probability, the price is marked NO_VALUE. The signal is therefore not treated automatically as a value bet.
The normalized movement for the Asian pair Jonava 0 / FA Šiauliai II 0 supports Jonava by an average 3.23 percentage points across 1 bookmakers (1xBet) with up to 2 stored observations. This is a market signal, not a result guarantee.
The match between Jonava and FA Šiauliai II ended 0-1. The game produced 1 goal in total. The first half contained 1 goal. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The previous 5 head-to-head meetings averaged 3.6 goals, while this match produced 1. The final scoring profile differed by more than one goal from that average. Across the previous 5 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome for this indicator was No BTTS. The final result did not align with that historical profile. Across the previous 5 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Over 2.5 at 80%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Under 2.5. The final result did not align with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated BTTS at 70%. The actual outcome was No BTTS. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 2.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
The Asian-handicap signal locked before kickoff supported Jonava at 0. The stored market movement was 3.23 percentage points across 1 bookmaker. At the final score of 0-1, the line settled as a full loss. The Asian-handicap signal was not confirmed.
Of 10 verifiable pre-match indicators, 3 aligned with the final result and 7 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.