Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 18.05.2025 | Nafta - Celje | 1 : 6 |
| 16.03.2025 | Celje - Nafta | 3 : 2 |
| 01.12.2024 | Nafta - Celje | 0 : 0 |
| 15.09.2024 | Celje - Nafta | 3 : 1 |
| 22.11.2023 | Nafta - Celje | 1 : 1 |
| 08.07.2022 | Celje - Nafta | 5 : 1 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09.08.2026 | Aluminij - Nafta | 1 - 1 | D |
| 01.08.2026 | Nafta - Mura | 5 - 2 | W |
| 26.07.2026 | Bravo - Nafta | 0 - 3 | W |
| 17.07.2026 | Nafta - Koper | 0 - 2 | L |
| 11.07.2026 | Nafta - FK Partizan | 1 - 4 | L |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11.08.2026 | Celje - Ararat-Armenia | 2 - 0 | W |
| 08.08.2026 | Celje - Olimpija Ljubljana | 1 - 0 | W |
| 04.08.2026 | Ararat-Armenia - Celje | 2 - 1 | L |
| 01.08.2026 | Celje - Maribor | 1 - 1 | D |
| 28.07.2026 | Celje - Egnatia Rrogozhinë | 1 - 1 | D |
The upcoming match between Nafta and Celje is scheduled for 15.08.2026 16:00 in 1. SNL. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Standings and season form
Nafta are in position 1 with 6 points after 3 matches. The season record is 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 losses. The goals record is 8 scored and 4 conceded. The stored form sequence is WWL. Celje are in position 5 with 5 points after 2 matches. The season record is 0 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses. The goals record is 3 scored and 3 conceded. The stored form sequence is WDD.
Nafta recorded 3 wins, 3 draws and 4 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is DWWLLLWDDL. The averages are 1.30 goals scored and 1.50 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 50% finished with over 2.5 goals. Celje recorded 3 wins, 5 draws and 2 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WWLDDDDWDL. The averages are 1.60 goals scored and 1.40 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 70% of those matches, while 40% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 6 head-to-head matches, Nafta recorded 0 wins, there were 2 draws, and Celje recorded 4 wins. The average total was 4 goals per match. Both teams scored in 83.3% of those matches, while 66.7% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 1.5 goals — 90%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 80%; Over 2.5 goals — 70%; Both teams to score — 60%; Under 3.5 goals — 60%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The normalized movement for the Asian pair Nafta 0 / Celje 0 supports Nafta by an average 6.26 percentage points across 3 bookmakers (Pinnacle, Bet365, 1xBet) with up to 12 stored observations. This is a market signal, not a result guarantee.
The discipline profile for Nafta at home is based on 2 matches. The team averages 1.50 yellow cards, 0.00 red cards and 1.50 total cards per match. At least 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cards were recorded in 100.0%, 50.0%, 0.0%, 0.0% and 0.0% of those matches respectively, while a red card occurred in 0.0%. Season card data is available for 3 of 4 completed matches (75.0% coverage).
The match between Nafta and Celje ended 1-3. The game produced 4 goals in total. The first half contained 3 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The previous 6 head-to-head meetings averaged 4 total goals, while this match produced 4. That is an exact match with the historical scoring profile. Across the previous 6 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was BTTS at 83.3%. The actual outcome for this indicator was BTTS. The final result aligned with that historical profile. Across the previous 6 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Over 2.5 at 66.7%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Over 2.5. The final result aligned with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was BTTS. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 90%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 3.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result.
Before kickoff, the discipline profile for Nafta at home was based on 2 matches, with averages of 1.5 yellow cards, 0 red cards and 1.5 total cards per match. In this game, Nafta received 2 yellow cards and 0 red cards, 2 in total. That was 0.5 cards above the stored average. In the pre-match sample, 3+ cards occurred in 0% of matches, 5+ in 0%, and a red card in 0%.
The Asian-handicap signal locked before kickoff supported Nafta at 0. The stored market movement was 6.26 percentage points across 3 bookmakers. At the final score of 1-3, the line settled as a full loss. The Asian-handicap signal was not confirmed.
Of 10 verifiable pre-match indicators, 7 aligned with the final result and 3 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.