Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08.08.2026 | Vålerenga W - Omonia W | 2 - 0 | W |
| 05.08.2026 | Vålerenga W - Malmö FF W | 0 - 1 | L |
| 20.06.2026 | Rosenborg W - Vålerenga W | 3 - 2 | L |
| 13.06.2026 | Vålerenga W - Brann W | 0 - 3 | L |
| 31.05.2026 | Lyn W - Vålerenga W | 2 - 0 | L |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08.08.2026 | Eintracht Frankfurt W - Malmö FF W | 2 - 0 | L |
| 05.08.2026 | Vålerenga W - Malmö FF W | 0 - 1 | W |
| 31.07.2026 | Malmö FF W - Piteå W | 0 - 0 | D |
| 27.07.2026 | Vittsjö - Malmö FF W | 1 - 0 | L |
| 27.06.2026 | Malmö FF W - Kristianstad | 6 - 0 | W |
The upcoming match between Vålerenga W and Malmö FF W is scheduled for 05.08.2026 11:00 in UEFA Champions League Women. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Vålerenga W recorded 5 wins, 1 draws and 4 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LLLWLWWWDW. The averages are 2.30 goals scored and 1.40 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 80% finished with over 2.5 goals. Malmö FF W recorded 4 wins, 3 draws and 3 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is DLWWDWDLLW. The averages are 1.60 goals scored and 0.80 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 40% of those matches, while 50% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 0.5 first-half goals — 80%; Over 1.5 goals — 80%; Under 3.5 goals — 70%; Over 2.5 goals — 60%; Both teams to score — 40%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The match between Vålerenga W and Malmö FF W ended 0-1. The game produced 1 goal in total. The first half contained 1 goal. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated No BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was No BTTS. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 2.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
Of 6 verifiable pre-match indicators, 4 aligned with the final result and 2 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.