Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 11.04.2026 | Triglav - Dravinja | 2 : 1 |
| 28.09.2025 | Dravinja - Triglav | 2 : 4 |
| 18.05.2025 | Triglav - Dravinja | 4 : 0 |
| 10.11.2024 | Dravinja - Triglav | 1 : 0 |
| 11.11.2023 | Dravinja - Triglav | 2 : 1 |
| 30.08.2023 | Triglav - Dravinja | 6 : 1 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22.08.2026 | Dren Vrhnika - Dravinja | 2 - 0 | L |
| 16.08.2026 | Dravinja - Bilje | 1 - 3 | L |
| 09.08.2026 | Ilirija - Dravinja | 1 - 0 | L |
| 23.05.2026 | Jesenice - Dravinja | 0 - 1 | W |
| 16.05.2026 | Dravinja - Krško | 2 - 1 | W |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21.08.2026 | Triglav - Brežice | - | |
| 14.08.2026 | Tabor Sežana - Triglav | 1 - 0 | L |
| 07.08.2026 | Dren Vrhnika - Triglav | 0 - 1 | W |
| 22.05.2026 | Nafta - Triglav | 1 - 1 | D |
| 16.05.2026 | Triglav - Bistrica | 0 - 4 | L |
The upcoming match between Dravinja and Triglav is scheduled for 29.08.2026 15:00 in 2. SNL. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Standings and season form
Dravinja are in position 16 with 0 points. The stored form sequence is LLL. Triglav are in position 11 with 3 points after 1 matches. The season record is 1 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses. The goals record is 1 scored and 0 conceded. The stored form sequence is LW.
Dravinja recorded 5 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LLLWWDWWDW. The averages are 1.10 goals scored and 1.10 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 40% finished with over 2.5 goals. Triglav recorded 7 wins, 1 draws and 2 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LWDLWWWWWW. The averages are 1.50 goals scored and 0.70 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 20% of those matches, while 40% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 6 head-to-head matches, Dravinja recorded 2 wins, there were 0 draws, and Triglav recorded 4 wins. The average total was 4 goals per match. Both teams scored in 66.7% of those matches, while 83.3% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Under 3.5 goals — 70%; Over 1.5 goals — 60%; Under 2.5 goals — 60%; Both teams to score — 50%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 50%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The PMV3 model classifies the leading outcome as Triglav to win with 61% confidence. The stored fair probabilities for home, draw and away are 17.07%, 22.40% and 60.54%. The model momentum difference is 43.47 points in favour of Triglav. The input data quality score is 89/100. The stored price for the selected market is 1.48 with Bet365. The stored estimated EV is -10.41%. Despite the model probability, the price is marked NO_VALUE. The signal is therefore not treated automatically as a value bet.
The normalized movement for the Asian pair Dravinja 0 / Triglav 0 supports Dravinja by an average 2.54 percentage points across 2 bookmakers (Pinnacle, 1xBet) with up to 3 stored observations. This is a market signal, not a result guarantee.
2 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. Goals Over/Under — Under 2.5 (odds 2). Goals Over/Under — Over 1.5 (odds 1.24, score 80/100, 79.81% bucket win rate across 104 observations).
The match between Dravinja and Triglav ended 1-4. The game produced 5 goals in total. The first half contained 2 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The historical profile from 6 head-to-head meetings averaged 4 goals, while this match produced 5. The result remained within one goal of the historical average. Across the previous 6 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was BTTS at 66.7%. The actual outcome for this indicator was BTTS. The final result aligned with that historical profile. Across the previous 6 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Over 2.5 at 83.3%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Over 2.5. The final result aligned with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 3.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result.
The Asian-handicap signal locked before kickoff supported Dravinja at 0. The stored market movement was 2.54 percentage points across 2 bookmakers. At the final score of 1-4, the line settled as a full loss. The Asian-handicap signal was not confirmed.
The stored Premium market was Under 2.5 at odds of 2. The actual market outcome was Over 2.5. The Premium signal was not confirmed. The stored Premium market was Over 1.5 FT at odds of 1.24. The actual market outcome was Over 1.5 FT. The Premium signal was confirmed.
Of 10 verifiable pre-match indicators, 5 aligned with the final result and 5 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.