Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 03.04.2026 | Krka - Triglav | 0 : 2 |
| 20.09.2025 | Triglav - Krka | 2 : 2 |
| 04.05.2025 | Krka - Triglav | 0 : 2 |
| 18.10.2024 | Triglav - Krka | 3 : 0 |
| 01.03.2024 | Krka - Triglav | 3 : 1 |
| 12.08.2023 | Triglav - Krka | 0 : 1 |
| 26.11.2022 | Triglav - Krka | 0 : 4 |
| 14.08.2022 | Krka - Triglav | 2 : 0 |
| 19.11.2021 | Triglav - Krka | 2 : 1 |
| 06.08.2021 | Krka - Triglav | 1 : 2 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13.11.2026 | Triglav - Bilje | 4 - 2 | W |
| 06.11.2026 | Ilirija - Triglav | 1 - 4 | W |
| 02.11.2026 | Triglav - Krka | 2 - 4 | L |
| 28.10.2026 | Beltinci - Triglav | 3 - 4 | W |
| 23.10.2026 | Triglav - Nafta | 1 - 1 | D |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13.11.2026 | Dravinja - Krka | 3 - 0 | L |
| 07.11.2026 | Krka - Brežice | 1 - 0 | W |
| 02.11.2026 | Triglav - Krka | 2 - 4 | W |
| 27.10.2026 | Krka - Dren Vrhnika | 3 - 0 | W |
| 17.10.2026 | Bilje - Krka | 2 - 0 | L |
The upcoming match between Triglav and Krka is scheduled for 02.11.2026 16:30 in 2. SNL. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Standings and season form
Triglav are in position 2 with 28 points after 12 matches. The season record is 9 wins, 1 draws and 2 losses. The goals record is 25 scored and 8 conceded. The stored form sequence is WWWWD. Krka are in position 14 with 10 points after 12 matches. The season record is 3 wins, 1 draws and 8 losses. The goals record is 13 scored and 20 conceded. The stored form sequence is WLLLL.
Triglav recorded 7 wins, 2 draws and 1 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WDWWWDWWLW. The averages are 2.10 goals scored and 0.70 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 30% of those matches, while 40% finished with over 2.5 goals. Krka recorded 3 wins, 0 draws and 7 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WLLLLLWWLL. The averages are 1.30 goals scored and 1.70 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 70% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 10 head-to-head matches, Triglav recorded 5 wins, there were 1 draws, and Krka recorded 4 wins. The average total was 2.80 goals per match. Both teams scored in 40% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 1.5 goals — 90%; Under 3.5 goals — 90%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 70%; Over 2.5 goals — 60%; Both teams to score — 40%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The PMV3 model classifies the leading outcome as Triglav to win with 67% confidence. The stored fair probabilities for home, draw and away are 66.66%, 19.70% and 13.64%. The model momentum difference is 53.02 points in favour of Triglav. The input data quality score is 92/100. The stored price for the selected market is 1.33 with Bet365. The stored estimated EV is -11.34%. Despite the model probability, the price is marked NO_VALUE. The signal is therefore not treated automatically as a value bet.
The normalized movement for the Asian pair Triglav 0 / Krka 0 supports Krka by an average 1.87 percentage points across 1 bookmakers (1xBet) with up to 2 stored observations. This is a market signal, not a result guarantee.
The match between Triglav and Krka ended 2-4. The game produced 6 goals in total. The first half contained 3 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The previous 10 head-to-head meetings averaged 2.8 goals, while this match produced 6. The final scoring profile differed by more than one goal from that average. Across the previous 10 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was No BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome for this indicator was BTTS. The final result did not align with that historical profile. Across the previous 10 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Over 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Over 2.5. The final result aligned with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated No BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was BTTS. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 90%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 90%. The actual outcome was Over 3.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result.
The Asian-handicap signal locked before kickoff supported Krka at 0. The stored market movement was 1.87 percentage points across 1 bookmaker. At the final score of 2-4, the line settled as a full win. The Asian-handicap signal was confirmed.
Of 10 verifiable pre-match indicators, 5 aligned with the final result and 5 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.