Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 02.11.2024 | Rotherham - Cheltenham | 1 : 3 |
| 22.01.2022 | Rotherham - Cheltenham | 1 : 0 |
| 02.10.2021 | Cheltenham - Rotherham | 0 : 2 |
| 16.03.2013 | Cheltenham - Rotherham | 3 : 0 |
| 17.11.2012 | Rotherham - Cheltenham | 4 : 2 |
| 09.04.2012 | Rotherham - Cheltenham | 1 : 0 |
| 30.12.2011 | Cheltenham - Rotherham | 1 : 0 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08.08.2026 | Cheltenham - Charlton | 1 - 3 | L |
| 01.08.2026 | Cheltenham - Milton Keynes Dons | 0 - 2 | L |
| 18.07.2026 | Evesham United - Cheltenham | 0 - 3 | W |
| 14.07.2026 | Slimbridge - Cheltenham | - | |
| 02.05.2026 | Cheltenham - Colchester | 1 - 4 | L |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08.08.2026 | Rotherham - West Brom | 1 - 4 | L |
| 04.08.2026 | Rotherham - Derby | 1 - 1 | D |
| 28.07.2026 | Darlington 1883 - Rotherham | 0 - 2 | W |
| 25.07.2026 | Rotherham - Sheffield Utd | 0 - 2 | L |
| 21.07.2026 | Alfreton Town - Rotherham | 0 - 1 | W |
The upcoming match between Cheltenham and Rotherham is scheduled for 15.08.2026 14:00 in League Two. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Cheltenham recorded 4 wins, 1 draws and 5 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LLWLLLWWWD. The averages are 1.40 goals scored and 1.80 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 70% finished with over 2.5 goals. Rotherham recorded 3 wins, 4 draws and 3 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LDWLWDDWLD. The averages are 1.10 goals scored and 1.30 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 20% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 7 head-to-head matches, Cheltenham recorded 3 wins, there were 0 draws, and Rotherham recorded 4 wins. The average total was 2.57 goals per match. Both teams scored in 28.6% of those matches, while 42.9% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 0.5 first-half goals — 90%; Over 1.5 goals — 90%; Under 3.5 goals — 60%; Over 1.5 first-half goals — 50%; Over 2.5 goals — 50%. The stored corner indicators are: average total corners — 10.60; over 7.5 corners — 100%; over 8.5 corners — 100%; over 9.5 corners — 100%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The normalized movement for the Asian pair Cheltenham -1 / Rotherham +1 supports Cheltenham by an average 1.41 percentage points across 3 bookmakers (Pinnacle, Bet365, 1xBet) with up to 8 stored observations. This is a market signal, not a result guarantee.
The match between Cheltenham and Rotherham ended 2-1. The game produced 3 goals in total. The first half contained 1 goal. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The historical profile from 7 head-to-head meetings averaged 2.57 goals, while this match produced 3. The result remained within one goal of the historical average. Across the previous 7 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was No BTTS at 71.4%. The actual outcome for this indicator was BTTS. The final result did not align with that historical profile. Across the previous 7 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Under 2.5 at 57.1%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Over 2.5. The final result did not align with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated No BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was BTTS. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 90%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 90%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
The Asian-handicap signal locked before kickoff supported Cheltenham at -1. The stored market movement was 1.41 percentage points across 3 bookmakers. At the final score of 2-1, the line settled as a push. The result is neutral and is counted as neither confirmed nor unconfirmed.
Of 8 verifiable pre-match indicators, 4 aligned with the final result and 3 were not confirmed, while 1 settled neutrally. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.