Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 07.02.2026 | AFC Wimbledon - Reading | 3 : 2 |
| 26.08.2025 | Reading - AFC Wimbledon | 2 : 1 |
| 16.08.2025 | Reading - AFC Wimbledon | 1 : 2 |
| 08.07.2023 | Reading - AFC Wimbledon | 0 : 1 |
| 19.07.2022 | AFC Wimbledon - Reading | 0 : 2 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18.08.2026 | Leyton Orient - AFC Wimbledon | 1 - 1 | D |
| 15.08.2026 | Huddersfield - AFC Wimbledon | 3 - 0 | L |
| 08.08.2026 | AFC Wimbledon - Newport County | 1 - 1 | D |
| 01.08.2026 | QPR - AFC Wimbledon | 2 - 3 | W |
| 28.07.2026 | Wealdstone - AFC Wimbledon | 1 - 0 | L |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18.08.2026 | Reading - Wycombe | 1 - 1 | D |
| 15.08.2026 | Reading - Luton | 3 - 4 | L |
| 08.08.2026 | Bromley - Reading | 1 - 1 | D |
| 01.08.2026 | Reading - Charlton | 3 - 0 | W |
| 31.07.2026 | Crawley Town - Reading | 0 - 1 | W |
The upcoming match between AFC Wimbledon and Reading is scheduled for 22.08.2026 14:00 in League One. The listed venue is The Cherry Red Records Stadium, London. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Standings and season form
AFC Wimbledon are in position 24 with 0 points after 1 matches. The season record is 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 losses. The goals record is 0 scored and 3 conceded. The stored form sequence is L. Reading are in position 17 with 0 points after 1 matches. The season record is 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 losses. The goals record is 3 scored and 4 conceded. The stored form sequence is L.
AFC Wimbledon recorded 4 wins, 3 draws and 3 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is DLDWLWDWLW. The averages are 1 goals scored and 1.30 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 40% of those matches, while 40% finished with over 2.5 goals. Reading recorded 5 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is DLDWWWWLWL. The averages are 1.70 goals scored and 0.90 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 40% of those matches, while 40% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 5 head-to-head matches, AFC Wimbledon recorded 3 wins, there were 0 draws, and Reading recorded 2 wins. The average total was 2.80 goals per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 0.5 first-half goals — 70%; Over 1.5 goals — 70%; Under 3.5 goals — 70%; Over 2.5 goals — 50%; Under 2.5 goals — 50%. The stored corner indicators are: average total corners — 9.10; over 7.5 corners — 100%; over 8.5 corners — 100%; over 9.5 corners — 96%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The normalized movement for the Asian pair AFC Wimbledon -0.5 / Reading +0.5 supports Reading by an average 1.98 percentage points across 3 bookmakers (Pinnacle, Bet365, Unibet) with up to 15 stored observations. This is a market signal, not a result guarantee.
1 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. Odd/Even — Odd (odds 2).
The match between AFC Wimbledon and Reading ended 0-0. The game produced 0 goals in total. The first half contained 0 goals. The verified final statistics recorded 10 corners in total. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The previous 5 head-to-head meetings averaged 2.8 goals, while this match produced 0. The final scoring profile differed by more than one goal from that average. Across the previous 5 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome for this indicator was No BTTS. The final result did not align with that historical profile. Across the previous 5 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Over 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Under 2.5. The final result did not align with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated No BTTS at 80%. The actual outcome was No BTTS. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. The stored pre-match average was 9.1 total corners. The match recorded 10 corners in total. The result remained within one corner of the stored average. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 7.5 corners at 100%. The actual outcome was Over 7.5 corners. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 8.5 corners at 100%. The actual outcome was Over 8.5 corners. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 9.5 corners at 96%. The actual outcome was Over 9.5 corners. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 0.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 80%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
The Asian-handicap signal locked before kickoff supported Reading at +0.5. The stored market movement was 1.98 percentage points across 3 bookmakers. At the final score of 0-0, the line settled as a full win. The Asian-handicap signal was confirmed.
The stored Premium market was Odd at odds of 2. The actual market outcome was Even. The Premium signal was not confirmed.
Of 14 verifiable pre-match indicators, 8 aligned with the final result and 6 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.