Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03.09.2026 | Sportfreunde Schwaig - Ismaning | 2 - 2 | D |
| 28.08.2026 | Erlbach - Ismaning | 2 - 0 | L |
| 22.08.2026 | Ismaning - Kirchanschöring | 4 - 0 | W |
| 18.08.2026 | Gundelfingen - Ismaning | 0 - 5 | W |
| 14.08.2026 | Ismaning - 1880 Wasserburg | 2 - 3 | L |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11.09.2026 | 1880 Wasserburg - Heimstetten | 5 - 1 | W |
| 05.09.2026 | Pipinsried - 1880 Wasserburg | 3 - 1 | L |
| 28.08.2026 | 1880 Wasserburg - 1860 München II | 4 - 0 | W |
| 21.08.2026 | Kottern - 1880 Wasserburg | 0 - 1 | W |
| 18.08.2026 | 1880 Wasserburg - 1860 Rosenheim | 2 - 0 | W |
The upcoming match between Ismaning and 1880 Wasserburg is scheduled for 14.08.2026 16:30 in Oberliga - Bayern Süd. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Ismaning recorded 3 wins, 3 draws and 4 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LWLDLWDWLD. The averages are 1 goals scored and 1.50 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 40% of those matches, while 50% finished with over 2.5 goals. 1880 Wasserburg recorded 1 wins, 1 draws and 4 losses across the last 6 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is DLLLLW. The averages are 1.83 goals scored and 3.33 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 100% of those matches, while 100% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 1.5 goals — 90%; Both teams to score — 80%; Over 2.5 goals — 80%; Over 3.5 goals — 80%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 60%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The match between Ismaning and 1880 Wasserburg ended 2-3. The game produced 5 goals in total. The first half contained 1 goal. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated BTTS at 80%. The actual outcome was BTTS. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 90%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 3.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
Of 6 verifiable pre-match indicators, 6 aligned with the final result and 0 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.