Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 22.02.2026 | FC Porto - Rio Ave | 1 : 0 |
| 19.09.2025 | Rio Ave - FC Porto | 0 : 3 |
| 03.02.2025 | Rio Ave - FC Porto | 2 : 2 |
| 24.08.2024 | FC Porto - Rio Ave | 2 : 0 |
| 03.02.2024 | FC Porto - Rio Ave | 0 : 0 |
| 28.08.2023 | Rio Ave - FC Porto | 1 : 2 |
| 18.02.2023 | FC Porto - Rio Ave | 1 : 0 |
| 28.08.2022 | Rio Ave - FC Porto | 3 : 1 |
| 15.12.2021 | FC Porto - Rio Ave | 1 : 0 |
| 15.05.2021 | Rio Ave - FC Porto | 0 : 3 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15.08.2026 | Rio Ave - FC Porto | 0 - 2 | L |
| 09.08.2026 | GIL Vicente - Rio Ave | 1 - 0 | L |
| 01.08.2026 | Rio Ave - Tondela | 3 - 1 | W |
| 23.07.2026 | Rio Ave - Guimaraes | - | |
| 19.07.2026 | Rio Ave - Al-Ahli Jeddah | 2 - 2 | D |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15.08.2026 | Rio Ave - FC Porto | 0 - 2 | W |
| 09.08.2026 | FC Porto - Alverca | 2 - 0 | W |
| 01.08.2026 | FC Porto - Torreense | 1 - 0 | W |
| 25.07.2026 | FC Porto - Aston Villa | 2 - 1 | W |
| 16.05.2026 | FC Porto - Santa Clara | 1 - 0 | W |
The upcoming match between Rio Ave and FC Porto is scheduled for 15.08.2026 19:30 in Primeira Liga. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Rio Ave recorded 3 wins, 4 draws and 3 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LWDWWDLDLD. The averages are 1.40 goals scored and 1.40 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals. FC Porto recorded 7 wins, 1 draws and 2 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WWWWLWWDWL. The averages are 1.20 goals scored and 0.60 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 30% of those matches, while 30% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 10 head-to-head matches, Rio Ave recorded 1 wins, there were 2 draws, and FC Porto recorded 7 wins. The average total was 2.20 goals per match. Both teams scored in 30% of those matches, while 50% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 1.5 goals — 70%; Under 3.5 goals — 70%; Both teams to score — 60%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 60%; Over 2.5 goals — 60%. The stored corner indicators are: average total corners — 11.18; over 7.5 corners — 100%; over 8.5 corners — 100%; over 9.5 corners — 100%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The PMV3 model classifies the leading outcome as FC Porto to win with 69% confidence. The stored fair probabilities for home, draw and away are 11.06%, 19.80% and 69.14%. The model momentum difference is 58.08 points in favour of FC Porto. The input data quality score is 96/100. The stored price for the selected market is 1.36 with Bet365. The stored estimated EV is -5.97%. Despite the model probability, the price is marked NO_VALUE. The signal is therefore not treated automatically as a value bet.
The normalized movement for the Asian pair Rio Ave 0 / FC Porto 0 supports FC Porto by an average 1.31 percentage points across 2 bookmakers (Bet365, 1xBet) with up to 5 stored observations. This is a market signal, not a result guarantee.
1 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. Goals Over/Under — Under 2.5 (odds 2).
The match between Rio Ave and FC Porto ended 0-2. The game produced 2 goals in total. The first half contained 1 goal. The verified final statistics recorded 12 corners in total. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The historical profile from 10 head-to-head meetings averaged 2.2 goals, while this match produced 2. The result remained within one goal of the historical average. Across the previous 10 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was No BTTS at 70%. The actual outcome for this indicator was No BTTS. The final result aligned with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was No BTTS. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 2.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. The stored pre-match average was 11.18 total corners. The match recorded 12 corners in total. The result remained within one corner of the stored average. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 7.5 corners at 100%. The actual outcome was Over 7.5 corners. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 8.5 corners at 100%. The actual outcome was Over 8.5 corners. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 9.5 corners at 100%. The actual outcome was Over 9.5 corners. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 80%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
The Asian-handicap signal locked before kickoff supported FC Porto at 0. The stored market movement was 1.31 percentage points across 2 bookmakers. At the final score of 0-2, the line settled as a full win. The Asian-handicap signal was confirmed.
The stored Premium market was Under 2.5 at odds of 2. The actual market outcome was Under 2.5. The Premium signal was confirmed.
Of 14 verifiable pre-match indicators, 12 aligned with the final result and 2 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.