Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 26.04.2026 | Penafiel - FC Porto B | 3 : 0 |
| 12.12.2025 | FC Porto B - Penafiel | 1 : 0 |
| 16.02.2025 | FC Porto B - Penafiel | 3 : 2 |
| 15.09.2024 | Penafiel - FC Porto B | 1 : 1 |
| 30.03.2024 | FC Porto B - Penafiel | 3 : 1 |
| 11.11.2023 | Penafiel - FC Porto B | 3 : 2 |
| 03.04.2023 | Penafiel - FC Porto B | 1 : 2 |
| 19.10.2022 | FC Porto B - Penafiel | 0 : 0 |
| 07.05.2022 | Penafiel - FC Porto B | 1 : 2 |
| 23.12.2021 | FC Porto B - Penafiel | 3 : 1 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24.08.2026 | Feirense - FC Porto B | 0 - 1 | W |
| 16.08.2026 | FC Porto B - Farense | 1 - 3 | L |
| 10.08.2026 | Lusitânia Lourosa - FC Porto B | 2 - 0 | L |
| 29.07.2026 | Lusitânia Lourosa - FC Porto B | 3 - 3 | D |
| 25.07.2026 | FC Porto B - Academica | 1 - 3 | L |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23.08.2026 | Penafiel - Sporting CP B | 2 - 0 | W |
| 15.08.2026 | Torreense - Penafiel | 2 - 2 | D |
| 08.08.2026 | Penafiel - Portimonense | 0 - 1 | L |
| 24.07.2026 | Penafiel - Leganes | 0 - 2 | L |
| 18.07.2026 | Famalicao - Penafiel | 0 - 0 | D |
The upcoming match between FC Porto B and Penafiel is scheduled for 30.08.2026 17:00 in Segunda Liga. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Standings and season form
FC Porto B are in position 12 with 3 points. The stored form sequence is WLL. Penafiel are in position 10 with 4 points. The stored form sequence is WDL.
FC Porto B recorded 4 wins, 2 draws and 4 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WLLDLWWWLD. The averages are 1.10 goals scored and 1.50 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 40% of those matches, while 40% finished with over 2.5 goals. Penafiel recorded 3 wins, 2 draws and 5 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WDLLDLWLWL. The averages are 1.30 goals scored and 1.40 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 40% of those matches, while 50% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 10 head-to-head matches, FC Porto B recorded 6 wins, there were 2 draws, and Penafiel recorded 2 wins. The average total was 3 goals per match. Both teams scored in 70% of those matches, while 70% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 1.5 goals — 70%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 60%; Under 2.5 goals — 60%; Under 3.5 goals — 60%; Both teams to score — 40%. The stored corner indicators are: average total corners — 12.60; over 7.5 corners — 100%; over 8.5 corners — 100%; over 9.5 corners — 100%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The normalized movement for the Asian pair FC Porto B -0.75 / Penafiel +0.75 supports Penafiel by an average 3.96 percentage points across 3 bookmakers (Pinnacle, Bet365, 1xBet) with up to 12 stored observations. The current confirmed reversal event points in the same direction. This is a market signal, not a result guarantee.
The discipline profile for FC Porto B at home is based on 1 matches. The team averages 3.00 yellow cards, 0.00 red cards and 3.00 total cards per match. At least 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cards were recorded in 100.0%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 0.0% and 0.0% of those matches respectively, while a red card occurred in 0.0%. Season card data is available for 3 of 3 completed matches (100.0% coverage). The discipline profile for Penafiel away from home is based on 1 matches. The team averages 3.00 yellow cards, 0.00 red cards and 3.00 total cards per match. At least 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cards were recorded in 100.0%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 0.0% and 0.0% of those matches respectively, while a red card occurred in 0.0%. Season card data is available for 3 of 3 completed matches (100.0% coverage).
The match between FC Porto B and Penafiel ended 0-3. The game produced 3 goals in total. The first half contained 2 goals. The verified final statistics recorded 0 corners in total. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The previous 10 head-to-head meetings averaged 3 total goals, while this match produced 3. That is an exact match with the historical scoring profile. Across the previous 10 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was BTTS at 70%. The actual outcome for this indicator was No BTTS. The final result did not align with that historical profile. Across the previous 10 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Over 2.5 at 70%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Over 2.5. The final result aligned with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated No BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was No BTTS. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. The stored pre-match average was 12.6 total corners. The match recorded 0 corners in total. The result differed by more than one corner from the stored average. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 7.5 corners at 100%. The actual outcome was Under 7.5 corners. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 8.5 corners at 100%. The actual outcome was Under 8.5 corners. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 9.5 corners at 100%. The actual outcome was Under 9.5 corners. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result.
Before kickoff, the discipline profile for FC Porto B at home was based on 1 matches, with averages of 3 yellow cards, 0 red cards and 3 total cards per match. In this game, FC Porto B received 4 yellow cards and 0 red cards, 4 in total. That was 1 cards above the stored average. In the pre-match sample, 3+ cards occurred in 100% of matches, 5+ in 0%, and a red card in 0%. Before kickoff, the discipline profile for Penafiel away from home was based on 1 matches, with averages of 3 yellow cards, 0 red cards and 3 total cards per match. In this game, Penafiel received 3 yellow cards and 0 red cards, 3 in total. The total was effectively equal to the stored average. In the pre-match sample, 3+ cards occurred in 100% of matches, 5+ in 0%, and a red card in 0%.
The Asian-handicap signal locked before kickoff supported Penafiel at +0.75. The stored market movement was 3.96 percentage points across 3 bookmakers. At the final score of 0-3, the line settled as a full win. The Asian-handicap signal was confirmed.
Of 14 verifiable pre-match indicators, 7 aligned with the final result and 7 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.