Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20.08.2026 | RTC W - Nasaf W | 0 - 3 | L |
| 17.08.2026 | Banaat W - RTC W | 0 - 0 | D |
| 31.08.2025 | Master W - RTC W | 0 - 5 | W |
| 28.08.2025 | RTC W - Naegohyang W | 0 - 7 | L |
| 25.08.2025 | Kaohsiung W - RTC W | 2 - 0 | L |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20.08.2026 | RTC W - Nasaf W | 0 - 3 | W |
| 17.08.2026 | Nasaf W - Master W | 11 - 0 | W |
| 29.03.2026 | Melbourne City W - Nasaf W | 2 - 1 | L |
| 23.11.2025 | East Bengal W - Nasaf W | 0 - 3 | W |
| 20.11.2025 | Nasaf W - Bam Khatoon W | 0 - 1 | L |
The upcoming match between RTC W and Nasaf W is scheduled for 20.08.2026 15:00 in AFC Women's Champions League. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
RTC W recorded 1 wins, 0 draws and 4 losses across the last 5 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WLLLL. The averages are 1.20 goals scored and 2.40 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 20% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals. Nasaf W recorded 6 wins, 1 draws and 3 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WLWLDWWWLW. The averages are 2.40 goals scored and 0.70 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 40% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 0.5 first-half goals — 100%; Over 1.5 goals — 80%; Under 3.5 goals — 80%; Over 2.5 goals — 60%; Over 1.5 first-half goals — 50%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The match between RTC W and Nasaf W ended 0-3. The game produced 3 goals in total. The first half contained 1 goal. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated No BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was No BTTS. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 100%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
Of 5 verifiable pre-match indicators, 5 aligned with the final result and 0 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.