Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08.11.2026 | Eendracht Aalst - RFC Wetteren | 2 - 2 | D |
| 01.11.2026 | HO Kalken - RFC Wetteren | 4 - 1 | L |
| 25.10.2026 | RFC Wetteren - Torhout | 1 - 0 | W |
| 17.10.2026 | FC Lebbeke - RFC Wetteren | 3 - 2 | L |
| 11.10.2026 | RFC Wetteren - Sparta Petegem | 1 - 1 | D |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08.11.2026 | Londerzeel - Voorde Appelterre | 1 - 1 | D |
| 31.10.2026 | FC Lebbeke - Londerzeel | 3 - 0 | L |
| 25.10.2026 | Londerzeel - HO Kalken | 1 - 1 | D |
| 18.10.2026 | Londerzeel - Diksmuide | 3 - 2 | W |
| 10.10.2026 | Zulte Waregem II - Londerzeel | 0 - 0 | D |
The upcoming match between RFC Wetteren and Londerzeel is scheduled for 30.09.2026 18:00 in Second Amateur Division - VFV A. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
RFC Wetteren recorded 5 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WLWDDLWWDW. The averages are 1.60 goals scored and 1.20 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 40% of those matches, while 50% finished with over 2.5 goals. Londerzeel recorded 3 wins, 5 draws and 2 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LLDDWWDWDD. The averages are 1.20 goals scored and 1.20 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 50% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 1.5 goals — 80%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 60%; Over 2.5 goals — 60%; Over 1.5 first-half goals — 50%; Over 3.5 goals — 50%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The match between RFC Wetteren and Londerzeel ended 1-1. The game produced 2 goals in total. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated No BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was BTTS. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 2.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result.
Of 3 verifiable pre-match indicators, 1 aligned with the final result and 2 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.