Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29.08.2026 | Little Oakley - Biggleswade | 2 - 3 | L |
| 16.08.2025 | Cockfosters - Little Oakley | 2 - 0 | L |
| 05.08.2025 | Little Oakley - Baldock Town | 1 - 0 | W |
| 02.08.2025 | Baldock Town - Little Oakley | 1 - 1 | D |
| 17.08.2024 | Little Oakley - Berkhamsted | 1 - 4 | L |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29.08.2026 | Little Oakley - Biggleswade | 2 - 3 | W |
| 14.07.2026 | Bedford Town - Biggleswade | 2 - 0 | L |
| 11.07.2026 | Tonbridge Angels - Biggleswade | 1 - 0 | L |
| 25.04.2026 | Flackwell Heath - Biggleswade | 0 - 2 | W |
| 18.04.2026 | Biggleswade - Beaconsfield Town | 6 - 1 | W |
The upcoming match between Little Oakley and Biggleswade is scheduled for 29.08.2026 14:00 in FA Trophy. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Little Oakley recorded 3 wins, 1 draws and 3 losses across the last 7 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LWDLWLW. The averages are 1.57 goals scored and 2.14 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 71.4% of those matches, while 57.1% finished with over 2.5 goals. Biggleswade recorded 8 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LLWWWWWWWW. The averages are 3.50 goals scored and 0.90 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 1.5 goals — 80%; Under 2.5 goals — 60%; Under 3.5 goals — 60%; Both teams to score — 50%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 40%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The match between Little Oakley and Biggleswade ended 2-3. The game produced 5 goals in total. The first half contained 1 goal. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 3.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 0.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 90%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
Of 5 verifiable pre-match indicators, 2 aligned with the final result and 3 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.