Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13.09.2026 | Roeselare Daisel - Mandel United | 1 - 0 | W |
| 06.09.2026 | Zelzate - Roeselare Daisel | 0 - 3 | W |
| 30.08.2026 | Roeselare Daisel - Spouwen-Mopertingen | 1 - 1 | D |
| 09.08.2026 | Roeselare Daisel - Lokeren-Temse | - | |
| 26.04.2026 | Roeselare Daisel - Thes Sport | 3 - 1 | W |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13.09.2026 | Roeselare Daisel - Mandel United | 1 - 0 | L |
| 05.09.2026 | Mandel United - Lyra-Lierse Berlaar | 1 - 1 | D |
| 30.08.2026 | Harelbeke - Mandel United | 0 - 3 | W |
| 26.04.2026 | Mandel United - VW Hamme | 0 - 0 | D |
| 19.04.2026 | HO Kalken - Mandel United | 0 - 0 | D |
The upcoming match between Roeselare Daisel and Mandel United is scheduled for 13.09.2026 13:00 in First Amateur Division. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Roeselare Daisel recorded 6 wins, 3 draws and 1 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WDWWDDLWWW. The averages are 2.20 goals scored and 1.10 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 50% finished with over 2.5 goals. Mandel United recorded 4 wins, 6 draws and 0 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is DWDDDWDDWW. The averages are 1.30 goals scored and 0.70 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 40% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 1.5 goals — 100%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 90%; Both teams to score — 70%; Under 3.5 goals — 70%; Over 2.5 goals — 60%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The match between Roeselare Daisel and Mandel United ended 1-0. The game produced 1 goal in total. The first half contained 1 goal. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated BTTS at 70%. The actual outcome was No BTTS. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 100%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 2.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 90%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
Of 6 verifiable pre-match indicators, 3 aligned with the final result and 3 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.