Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 18.04.2026 | Guilsfield - Gresford Athletic | 4 : 0 |
| 26.07.2025 | Gresford Athletic - Guilsfield | 1 : 3 |
| 08.03.2025 | Guilsfield - Gresford Athletic | 4 : 1 |
| 13.09.2024 | Gresford Athletic - Guilsfield | 1 : 0 |
| 01.04.2024 | Guilsfield - Gresford Athletic | 0 : 1 |
| 06.09.2023 | Gresford Athletic - Guilsfield | 1 : 1 |
| 14.02.2023 | Guilsfield - Gresford Athletic | 2 : 1 |
| 05.11.2022 | Gresford Athletic - Guilsfield | 0 : 0 |
| 21.01.2022 | Guilsfield - Gresford Athletic | 0 : 0 |
| 20.08.2021 | Gresford Athletic - Guilsfield | 0 : 2 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05.09.2026 | Brickfield Rangers - Guilsfield | 2 - 0 | L |
| 31.08.2026 | Guilsfield - Penrhyncoch | 4 - 0 | W |
| 28.08.2026 | Buckley Town - Guilsfield | 3 - 1 | L |
| 22.08.2026 | Guilsfield - Ruthin Town | 2 - 2 | D |
| 15.08.2026 | Newtown AFC - Guilsfield | 1 - 1 | D |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06.09.2026 | Gresford Athletic - Mold Alexandra | 1 - 5 | L |
| 31.08.2026 | Llanuwchllyn - Gresford Athletic | 2 - 0 | L |
| 21.08.2026 | Bala Town - Gresford Athletic | 3 - 0 | L |
| 16.08.2026 | Gresford Athletic - Brickfield Rangers | 0 - 5 | L |
| 08.08.2026 | Caersws - Gresford Athletic | 1 - 0 | L |
The upcoming match between Guilsfield and Gresford Athletic is scheduled for 12.09.2026 13:30 in FAW Championship. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Guilsfield recorded 4 wins, 3 draws and 3 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LWLDDWDWWL. The averages are 2.10 goals scored and 1.60 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 70% of those matches, while 70% finished with over 2.5 goals. Gresford Athletic recorded 0 wins, 0 draws and 10 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LLLLLLLLLL. The averages are 0.20 goals scored and 3 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 20% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 10 head-to-head matches, Guilsfield recorded 5 wins, there were 3 draws, and Gresford Athletic recorded 2 wins. The average total was 2.20 goals per match. Both teams scored in 40% of those matches, while 40% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 0.5 first-half goals — 90%; Over 1.5 goals — 90%; Over 2.5 goals — 60%; Under 3.5 goals — 60%; Over 1.5 first-half goals — 40%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The PMV3 model classifies the leading outcome as Guilsfield to win with 73% confidence. The stored fair probabilities for home, draw and away are 72.68%, 16.89% and 10.43%. The model momentum difference is 62.25 points in favour of Guilsfield. The input data quality score is 84/100. The stored price for the selected market is 1.22 with Bet365. The stored estimated EV is -11.33%. Despite the model probability, the price is marked NO_VALUE. The signal is therefore not treated automatically as a value bet.
The normalized movement for the Asian pair Guilsfield 0 / Gresford Athletic 0 supports Guilsfield by an average 2.17 percentage points across 1 bookmakers (1xBet) with up to 7 stored observations. This is a market signal, not a result guarantee.
1 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. Both Teams Score — Yes (odds 1.65).
The match between Guilsfield and Gresford Athletic ended 1-1. The game produced 2 goals in total. The first half contained 1 goal. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The historical profile from 10 head-to-head meetings averaged 2.2 goals, while this match produced 2. The result remained within one goal of the historical average. Across the previous 10 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was No BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome for this indicator was BTTS. The final result did not align with that historical profile. Across the previous 10 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Under 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Under 2.5. The final result aligned with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated No BTTS at 70%. The actual outcome was BTTS. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 90%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 2.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 90%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
The Asian-handicap signal locked before kickoff supported Gresford Athletic at 0. The stored market movement was 2.17 percentage points across 1 bookmaker. At the final score of 1-1, the line settled as a push. The result is neutral and is counted as neither confirmed nor unconfirmed.
The stored Premium market was BTTS Yes at odds of 1.65. The actual market outcome was BTTS Yes. The Premium signal was confirmed.
Of 11 verifiable pre-match indicators, 7 aligned with the final result and 3 were not confirmed, while 1 settled neutrally. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.