Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 22.03.2026 | FC Noah - Shirak | 3 : 0 |
| 16.03.2026 | Shirak - FC Noah | 0 : 2 |
| 03.08.2025 | FC Noah - Shirak | 4 : 0 |
| 29.03.2025 | Shirak - FC Noah | 1 : 2 |
| 02.03.2025 | FC Noah - Shirak | 4 : 0 |
| 11.08.2024 | Shirak - FC Noah | 0 : 5 |
| 27.04.2024 | Shirak - FC Noah | 1 : 0 |
| 26.02.2024 | FC Noah - Shirak | 1 : 0 |
| 26.10.2023 | Shirak - FC Noah | 0 : 2 |
| 18.08.2023 | FC Noah - Shirak | 4 : 0 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01.08.2026 | BKMA - Shirak | 0 - 0 | D |
| 24.07.2026 | Sardarapat - Shirak | - | |
| 26.05.2026 | Alashkert - Shirak | 2 - 0 | L |
| 18.05.2026 | Shirak - FC Urartu | 0 - 0 | D |
| 08.05.2026 | Van - Shirak | 1 - 0 | L |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06.08.2026 | FC Noah - FC Sion | 2 - 2 | D |
| 02.08.2026 | FC Noah - Syunik | 3 - 0 | W |
| 30.07.2026 | FC Noah - Zimbru | 2 - 1 | W |
| 23.07.2026 | Zimbru - FC Noah | 1 - 1 | D |
| 07.07.2026 | CFR 1907 Cluj - FC Noah | 1 - 1 | D |
The upcoming match between Shirak and FC Noah is scheduled for 09.08.2026 15:00 in Premier League. The listed venue is Gyumri City Stadium, Gyumri. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Standings and season form
Shirak are in position 6 with 1 points after 1 matches. The season record is 0 wins, 1 draws and 0 losses. The goals record is 0 scored and 0 conceded. The stored form sequence is D. FC Noah are in position 4 with 3 points after 1 matches. The season record is 1 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses. The goals record is 3 scored and 0 conceded. The stored form sequence is W.
Shirak recorded 0 wins, 4 draws and 6 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is DLDLLLLDDL. The averages are 0.30 goals scored and 1.40 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 20% of those matches, while 20% finished with over 2.5 goals. FC Noah recorded 4 wins, 5 draws and 1 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is DWWDDDWLWD. The averages are 1.70 goals scored and 0.80 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 40% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 10 head-to-head matches, Shirak recorded 1 wins, there were 0 draws, and FC Noah recorded 9 wins. The average total was 2.90 goals per match. Both teams scored in 10% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 1.5 goals — 80%; Under 3.5 goals — 80%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 60%; Under 2.5 goals — 60%; Over 2.5 goals — 40%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The PMV3 model classifies the leading outcome as FC Noah to win with 67% confidence. The stored fair probabilities for home, draw and away are 14.26%, 18.76% and 66.99%. The model momentum difference is 52.73 points in favour of FC Noah. The input data quality score is 91/100. The stored price for the selected market is 1.33 with Bet365. The stored estimated EV is -10.91%. Despite the model probability, the price is marked NO_VALUE. The signal is therefore not treated automatically as a value bet.
2 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. Goals Over/Under — Under 2.5 (odds 2). Goals Over/Under — Over 1.5 (odds 1.20, score 76/100, 76.19% bucket win rate across 378 observations).
The match between Shirak and FC Noah ended 3-4. The game produced 7 goals in total. The first half contained 2 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The previous 10 head-to-head meetings averaged 2.9 goals, while this match produced 7. The final scoring profile differed by more than one goal from that average. Across the previous 10 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was No BTTS at 90%. The actual outcome for this indicator was BTTS. The final result did not align with that historical profile. Across the previous 10 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Over 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Over 2.5. The final result aligned with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated No BTTS at 70%. The actual outcome was BTTS. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 3.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result.
The stored Premium market was Under 2.5 at odds of 2. The actual market outcome was Over 2.5. The Premium signal was not confirmed. The stored Premium market was Over 1.5 FT at odds of 1.2. The actual market outcome was Over 1.5 FT. The Premium signal was confirmed.
Of 11 verifiable pre-match indicators, 4 aligned with the final result and 7 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.