Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10.09.2026 | FC Tallinn - Maardu | 0 - 0 | D |
| 03.09.2026 | Viimsi - FC Tallinn | 1 - 2 | W |
| 29.08.2026 | FC Tallinn - Nõmme Kalju II | 0 - 2 | L |
| 23.08.2026 | FCI Levadia II - FC Tallinn | 2 - 1 | L |
| 20.08.2026 | FC Tallinn - Nõmme United II | 1 - 1 | D |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28.07.2026 | FC Tallinn - Tallinna FC Zapoos | 4 - 1 | L |
| 29.10.2025 | Tallinna FC Zapoos - Vaprus | 2 - 4 | L |
| 03.09.2025 | Tallinna FC Zapoos - Saku Sporting | 3 - 0 | W |
| 06.08.2025 | Tallinna FC Zapoos - Hell Hunt | 7 - 0 | W |
| 04.03.2025 | FC Levadia Tallinn - Tallinna FC Zapoos | 7 - 0 | L |
The upcoming match between FC Tallinn and Tallinna FC Zapoos is scheduled for 28.07.2026 16:30 in Cup. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
FC Tallinn recorded 3 wins, 2 draws and 5 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WLWLLLWDLD. The averages are 1.10 goals scored and 2.10 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 40% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals. Tallinna FC Zapoos recorded 5 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses across the last 7 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LWWLWWW. The averages are 3.43 goals scored and 2.57 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 57.1% of those matches, while 100% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 0.5 first-half goals — 100%; Over 1.5 goals — 100%; Over 1.5 first-half goals — 90%; Over 2.5 goals — 90%; Over 3.5 goals — 70%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The match between FC Tallinn and Tallinna FC Zapoos ended 4-1. The game produced 5 goals in total. The first half contained 0 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated No BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was BTTS. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 100%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 90%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 3.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 100%. The actual outcome was Under 0.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 HT at 90%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result.
Of 6 verifiable pre-match indicators, 3 aligned with the final result and 3 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.