Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11.08.2026 | Al Ittihad - Bangladesh Police | 1 - 0 | W |
| 03.07.2026 | Al Ittihad - Jaish | 2 - 0 | W |
| 28.06.2026 | Jabala - Al Ittihad | 1 - 4 | W |
| 24.06.2026 | Al Ittihad - Hottin | 4 - 0 | W |
| 19.06.2026 | Al Wahda - Al Ittihad | 1 - 1 | D |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11.08.2026 | Al Ittihad - Bangladesh Police | 1 - 0 | L |
| 23.05.2026 | Rahmatgonj MFS - Bangladesh Police | 0 - 0 | D |
| 15.05.2026 | Bangladesh Police - Arambagh | 2 - 0 | W |
| 08.05.2026 | Bashundhara Kings - Bangladesh Police | 1 - 1 | D |
| 01.05.2026 | Bangladesh Police - PWD Sports Club | 1 - 0 | W |
The upcoming match between Al Ittihad and Bangladesh Police is scheduled for 11.08.2026 17:00 in AFC Challenge League. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Al Ittihad recorded 9 wins, 1 draws and 0 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WWWDWWWWWW. The averages are 3.10 goals scored and 0.60 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 70% finished with over 2.5 goals. Bangladesh Police recorded 4 wins, 3 draws and 3 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is DWDWWLLLWD. The averages are 1.20 goals scored and 1.30 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 40% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 1.5 goals — 70%; Under 2.5 goals — 70%; Under 3.5 goals — 70%; Both teams to score — 40%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 40%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The match between Al Ittihad and Bangladesh Police ended 1-0. The game produced 1 goal in total. The first half contained 1 goal. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated No BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was No BTTS. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 2.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 2.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 0.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
Of 6 verifiable pre-match indicators, 4 aligned with the final result and 2 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.