Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 25.04.2026 | Scunthorpe - Eastleigh | 0 : 1 |
| 21.10.2025 | Eastleigh - Scunthorpe | 1 : 1 |
| 04.03.2023 | Scunthorpe - Eastleigh | 0 : 1 |
| 01.11.2022 | Eastleigh - Scunthorpe | 2 : 0 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15.08.2026 | Kidderminster Harriers - Eastleigh | 1 - 0 | L |
| 08.08.2026 | Eastleigh - Gateshead | 2 - 1 | W |
| 01.08.2026 | Farnham Town - Eastleigh | 1 - 0 | L |
| 28.07.2026 | Bognor Regis Town - Eastleigh | - | |
| 25.07.2026 | Eastleigh - Crawley Town | 0 - 1 | L |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18.08.2026 | Scunthorpe - Stoke City U21 | 4 - 0 | W |
| 15.08.2026 | Southend - Scunthorpe | 1 - 0 | L |
| 08.08.2026 | Scunthorpe - Yeovil Town | 1 - 1 | D |
| 31.07.2026 | Scunthorpe - Chesterfield | 1 - 1 | D |
| 28.07.2026 | North Ferriby - Scunthorpe | 3 - 6 | W |
The upcoming match between Eastleigh and Scunthorpe is scheduled for 22.08.2026 11:30 in National League. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Eastleigh recorded 2 wins, 1 draws and 7 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LWLLLLLLWD. The averages are 0.70 goals scored and 1.60 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 40% of those matches, while 40% finished with over 2.5 goals. Scunthorpe recorded 4 wins, 3 draws and 3 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WLDDWLDWLW. The averages are 1.70 goals scored and 1.20 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 40% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 4 head-to-head matches, Eastleigh recorded 3 wins, there were 1 draws, and Scunthorpe recorded 0 wins. The average total was 1.50 goals per match. Both teams scored in 25% of those matches, while 0% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Under 3.5 goals — 90%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 70%; Under 2.5 goals — 70%; Over 1.5 goals — 60%; Both teams to score — 40%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The normalized movement for the Asian pair Eastleigh -0.25 / Scunthorpe +0.25 supports Scunthorpe by an average 4.11 percentage points across 3 bookmakers (Pinnacle, Bet365, 1xBet) with up to 7 stored observations. This is a market signal, not a result guarantee.
The discipline profile for Scunthorpe away from home is based on 1 matches. The team averages 3.00 yellow cards, 0.00 red cards and 3.00 total cards per match. At least 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cards were recorded in 100.0%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 0.0% and 0.0% of those matches respectively, while a red card occurred in 0.0%. Season card data is available for 2 of 2 completed matches (100.0% coverage).
The match between Eastleigh and Scunthorpe ended 3-2. The game produced 5 goals in total. The first half contained 1 goal. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The previous 4 head-to-head meetings averaged 1.5 goals, while this match produced 5. The final scoring profile differed by more than one goal from that average. Across the previous 4 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was No BTTS at 75%. The actual outcome for this indicator was BTTS. The final result did not align with that historical profile. Across the previous 4 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Under 2.5 at 100%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Over 2.5. The final result did not align with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated No BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was BTTS. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 2.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 90%. The actual outcome was Over 3.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 90%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
Before kickoff, the discipline profile for Scunthorpe away from home was based on 1 matches, with averages of 3 yellow cards, 0 red cards and 3 total cards per match. In this game, Scunthorpe received 1 yellow cards and 0 red cards, 1 in total. That was 2 cards below the stored average. In the pre-match sample, 3+ cards occurred in 100% of matches, 5+ in 0%, and a red card in 0%.
The Asian-handicap signal locked before kickoff supported Scunthorpe at +0.25. The stored market movement was 4.11 percentage points across 3 bookmakers. At the final score of 3-2, the line settled as a full loss. The Asian-handicap signal was not confirmed.
Of 10 verifiable pre-match indicators, 3 aligned with the final result and 7 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.