Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 01.03.2026 | Rancho Santana - Matagalpa | 2 : 8 |
| 24.01.2026 | Matagalpa - Rancho Santana | 0 : 2 |
| 27.09.2025 | Matagalpa - Rancho Santana | 1 : 4 |
| 22.07.2025 | Rancho Santana - Matagalpa | 1 : 2 |
| 23.03.2025 | Rancho Santana - Matagalpa | 1 : 1 |
| 26.02.2025 | Matagalpa - Rancho Santana | 2 : 1 |
| 03.11.2024 | Matagalpa - Rancho Santana | 1 : 0 |
| 24.08.2024 | Rancho Santana - Matagalpa | 1 : 0 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23.08.2026 | Jalapa - Matagalpa | 0 - 1 | W |
| 16.08.2026 | Matagalpa - San Marcos | 1 - 0 | W |
| 10.08.2026 | Matagalpa - Managua | 0 - 3 | L |
| 03.08.2026 | Walter Ferretti - Matagalpa | 4 - 1 | L |
| 26.07.2026 | Real Estelí - Matagalpa | 2 - 0 | L |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23.08.2026 | Rancho Santana - San Marcos | 1 - 2 | L |
| 15.08.2026 | Rancho Santana - Walter Ferretti | 1 - 3 | L |
| 09.08.2026 | Diriangén - Rancho Santana | 2 - 1 | L |
| 01.08.2026 | Rancho Santana - H&H Export | 0 - 1 | L |
| 28.07.2026 | UNAN Managua - Rancho Santana | 2 - 0 | L |
The upcoming match between Matagalpa and Rancho Santana is scheduled for 30.08.2026 01:00 in Primera Division. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Standings and season form
Matagalpa are in position 10 with 0 points after 3 matches. The season record is 0 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses. The goals record is 1 scored and 9 conceded. The stored form sequence is LLL. Rancho Santana are in position 9 with 0 points after 3 matches. The season record is 0 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses. The goals record is 1 scored and 5 conceded. The stored form sequence is LLL.
Matagalpa recorded 3 wins, 0 draws and 7 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WWLLLLLWLL. The averages are 0.90 goals scored and 2 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 40% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals. Rancho Santana recorded 1 wins, 0 draws and 9 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LLLLLLLLWL. The averages are 1 goals scored and 2.10 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 8 head-to-head matches, Matagalpa recorded 4 wins, there were 1 draws, and Rancho Santana recorded 3 wins. The average total was 3.38 goals per match. Both teams scored in 62.5% of those matches, while 50% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Under 3.5 goals — 80%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 70%; Over 1.5 goals — 70%; Over 2.5 goals — 50%; Under 2.5 goals — 50%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The PMV3 model classifies the leading outcome as Matagalpa or draw (1X) with 82% confidence. The stored fair probabilities for home, draw and away are 59.17%, 23.17% and 17.65%. The model momentum difference is 41.52 points in favour of Matagalpa. The input data quality score is 91/100. The stored price for the selected market is 1.17 with Betano. The stored estimated EV is -3.65%. Despite the model probability, the price is marked NO_VALUE. The signal is therefore not treated automatically as a value bet.
The discipline profile for Rancho Santana away from home is based on 1 matches. The team averages 0.00 yellow cards, 1.00 red cards and 1.00 total cards per match. At least 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cards were recorded in 100.0%, 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.0% and 0.0% of those matches respectively, while a red card occurred in 100.0%. Season card data is available for 2 of 6 completed matches (33.3% coverage).
The match between Matagalpa and Rancho Santana ended 0-1. The game produced 1 goal in total. The first half contained 0 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The previous 8 head-to-head meetings averaged 3.38 goals, while this match produced 1. The final scoring profile differed by more than one goal from that average. Across the previous 8 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was BTTS at 62.5%. The actual outcome for this indicator was No BTTS. The final result did not align with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated No BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was No BTTS. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 0.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 80%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
Of 7 verifiable pre-match indicators, 3 aligned with the final result and 4 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.