Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21.08.2026 | Al Bataeh - Ittifaq | 1 - 0 | W |
| 16.05.2026 | Shabab Al Ahli Dubai - Al Bataeh | 1 - 1 | D |
| 10.05.2026 | Al Bataeh - Sharjah FC | 0 - 0 | D |
| 05.05.2026 | Dibba Al-Fujairah - Al Bataeh | 2 - 1 | L |
| 23.04.2026 | Al Bataeh - Al Ain | 0 - 2 | L |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21.08.2026 | Al Bataeh - Ittifaq | 1 - 0 | L |
| 29.05.2026 | Ittifaq - Gulf United | 1 - 0 | W |
| 23.05.2026 | Dubai United - Ittifaq | 1 - 1 | D |
| 15.05.2026 | Ittifaq - Emirates Club | 2 - 4 | L |
| 10.05.2026 | Dibba Al Hisn - Ittifaq | 2 - 2 | D |
The upcoming match between Al Bataeh and Ittifaq is scheduled for 21.08.2026 15:15 in Division 1. The listed venue is Khalid Bin Mohammed Stadium, Sharjah. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Al Bataeh recorded 1 wins, 5 draws and 4 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is DDLLDDDWLL. The averages are 0.70 goals scored and 1.10 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 20% finished with over 2.5 goals. Ittifaq recorded 4 wins, 2 draws and 4 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WDLDLLWWWL. The averages are 2.10 goals scored and 1.90 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 70% of those matches, while 70% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 1.5 goals — 80%; Both teams to score — 70%; Under 3.5 goals — 70%; Under 2.5 goals — 60%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 50%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The match between Al Bataeh and Ittifaq ended 1-0. The game produced 1 goal in total. The first half contained 0 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated BTTS at 70%. The actual outcome was No BTTS. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 2.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 90%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
Of 5 verifiable pre-match indicators, 3 aligned with the final result and 2 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.