Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12.09.2026 | Marine - Darlington 1883 | 2 - 1 | L |
| 08.09.2026 | Chorley - Darlington 1883 | 5 - 2 | L |
| 05.09.2026 | Darlington 1883 - King's Lynn Town | 0 - 2 | L |
| 31.08.2026 | Radcliffe - Darlington 1883 | 0 - 1 | W |
| 29.08.2026 | Darlington 1883 - Macclesfield | 1 - 2 | L |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12.09.2026 | Rotherham - Salford City | 3 - 3 | D |
| 05.09.2026 | Bristol Rovers - Rotherham | 1 - 0 | L |
| 01.09.2026 | Tranmere - Rotherham | 2 - 2 | D |
| 29.08.2026 | Rotherham - Chesterfield | 2 - 1 | W |
| 22.08.2026 | Rotherham - York | 1 - 1 | D |
The upcoming match between Darlington 1883 and Rotherham is scheduled for 28.07.2026 18:30 in Friendlies Clubs. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Darlington 1883 recorded 2 wins, 1 draws and 7 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LLLDLWLLLW. The averages are 1 goals scored and 2.20 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals. Rotherham recorded 3 wins, 3 draws and 4 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LWDDWLDLWL. The averages are 0.90 goals scored and 1.30 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 40% of those matches, while 20% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 0.5 first-half goals — 90%; Over 1.5 goals — 80%; Both teams to score — 60%; Over 1.5 first-half goals — 60%; Over 2.5 goals — 60%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The match between Darlington 1883 and Rotherham ended 0-2. The game produced 2 goals in total. The first half contained 2 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was No BTTS. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 2.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 90%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
Of 5 verifiable pre-match indicators, 3 aligned with the final result and 2 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.