📲 Click here and join our FREE Telegram channel GoalLineExpert App
? ? ? ? ?
1
🏟 Borough Briggs , Elgin
✔ Full Time
2
? ? ? ? ?

🔁 Head-to-Head

0
0
3
🟢 Elgin City 🟡 Draws Ross County 🔴
Date Match Score
03.07.2021 Elgin City - Ross County 0 : 5
10.11.2020 Elgin City - Ross County 1 : 4
14.07.2018 Ross County - Elgin City 2 : 0

🗓 Latest Matches: Elgin City

Date Match Score Res
08.08.2026 Elgin City - Forfar Athletic 1 - 1 D
01.08.2026 Edinburgh City - Elgin City 0 - 5 W
25.07.2026 Hamilton Academical - Elgin City 5 - 0 L
18.07.2026 Elgin City - Kilmarnock 0 - 1 L
14.07.2026 Elgin City - Peterhead 1 - 3 L

📆 Latest Matches: Ross County

Date Match Score Res
08.08.2026 Ross County - Montrose 2 - 1 W
01.08.2026 Peterhead - Ross County 0 - 1 W
25.07.2026 Airdrie United - Ross County 0 - 3 W
21.07.2026 Ross County - Dundee 1 - 1 D
18.07.2026 Ross County - Clyde 3 - 1 W

Pre-match analysis

This analysis is locked and its content can no longer be changed.

Match context

The upcoming match between Elgin City and Ross County is scheduled for 11.08.2026 18:45 in Challenge Cup. The listed venue is Borough Briggs, Elgin. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.

Recent results

Elgin City recorded 3 wins, 2 draws and 5 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is DWLLLLWWDL. The averages are 1.80 goals scored and 1.70 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals. Ross County recorded 8 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WWWDWDWWWW. The averages are 2.70 goals scored and 0.70 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 70% finished with over 2.5 goals.

Head-to-head

Across the last 3 head-to-head matches, Elgin City recorded 0 wins, there were 0 draws, and Ross County recorded 3 wins. The average total was 4 goals per match. Both teams scored in 33.3% of those matches, while 66.7% finished with over 2.5 goals.

Trend indicators

The highest stored values are: Over 0.5 first-half goals — 80%; Over 1.5 goals — 80%; Over 2.5 goals — 80%; Over 3.5 goals — 70%; Both teams to score — 50%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.

PMV3 model and market price

The PMV3 model classifies the leading outcome as Ross County to win with 63% confidence. The stored fair probabilities for home, draw and away are 16.28%, 20.68% and 63.05%. The model momentum difference is 46.77 points in favour of Ross County. The input data quality score is 96/100. The stored price for the selected market is 1.42 with Bet365. The stored estimated EV is -10.47%. Despite the model probability, the price is marked NO_VALUE. The signal is therefore not treated automatically as a value bet.

Premium market signals

2 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. Both Teams Score — Yes (odds 1.55). At least one goal in the match (quota 21, score 85/100, 84.63% group success rate across 950 observations).

Generated: 2026-08-10 20:45:03 · Locked: 2026-08-11 20:25:03

Post-match review

What happened in the match

The match between Elgin City and Ross County ended 1-2. The game produced 3 goals in total. The first half contained 2 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.

Comparison with the head-to-head history

The historical profile from 3 head-to-head meetings averaged 4 goals, while this match produced 3. The result remained within one goal of the historical average. Across the previous 3 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was No BTTS at 66.7%. The actual outcome for this indicator was BTTS. The final result did not align with that historical profile. Across the previous 3 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Over 2.5 at 66.7%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Over 2.5. The final result aligned with that historical profile.

Which pre-match trends were confirmed and which were not

Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 3.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result.

Premium market review

The stored Premium market was BTTS Yes at odds of 1.55. The actual market outcome was BTTS Yes. The Premium signal was confirmed. The stored Premium market was At least one FT goal with quota 21. The actual market outcome was At least one FT goal. The Premium signal was confirmed.

Summary

Of 10 verifiable pre-match indicators, 7 aligned with the final result and 3 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.

Added after the match: 2026-08-11 22:36:02
GoalLineExpert Support 🟢 Отговаряме възможно най-бързо
Здравей 👋
Напиши въпроса си тук. Ще получим известие и ще ти отговорим възможно най-бързо.