Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 03.07.2021 | Elgin City - Ross County | 0 : 5 |
| 10.11.2020 | Elgin City - Ross County | 1 : 4 |
| 14.07.2018 | Ross County - Elgin City | 2 : 0 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08.08.2026 | Elgin City - Forfar Athletic | 1 - 1 | D |
| 01.08.2026 | Edinburgh City - Elgin City | 0 - 5 | W |
| 25.07.2026 | Hamilton Academical - Elgin City | 5 - 0 | L |
| 18.07.2026 | Elgin City - Kilmarnock | 0 - 1 | L |
| 14.07.2026 | Elgin City - Peterhead | 1 - 3 | L |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08.08.2026 | Ross County - Montrose | 2 - 1 | W |
| 01.08.2026 | Peterhead - Ross County | 0 - 1 | W |
| 25.07.2026 | Airdrie United - Ross County | 0 - 3 | W |
| 21.07.2026 | Ross County - Dundee | 1 - 1 | D |
| 18.07.2026 | Ross County - Clyde | 3 - 1 | W |
The upcoming match between Elgin City and Ross County is scheduled for 11.08.2026 18:45 in Challenge Cup. The listed venue is Borough Briggs, Elgin. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Elgin City recorded 3 wins, 2 draws and 5 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is DWLLLLWWDL. The averages are 1.80 goals scored and 1.70 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals. Ross County recorded 8 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WWWDWDWWWW. The averages are 2.70 goals scored and 0.70 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 70% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 3 head-to-head matches, Elgin City recorded 0 wins, there were 0 draws, and Ross County recorded 3 wins. The average total was 4 goals per match. Both teams scored in 33.3% of those matches, while 66.7% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 0.5 first-half goals — 80%; Over 1.5 goals — 80%; Over 2.5 goals — 80%; Over 3.5 goals — 70%; Both teams to score — 50%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The PMV3 model classifies the leading outcome as Ross County to win with 63% confidence. The stored fair probabilities for home, draw and away are 16.28%, 20.68% and 63.05%. The model momentum difference is 46.77 points in favour of Ross County. The input data quality score is 96/100. The stored price for the selected market is 1.42 with Bet365. The stored estimated EV is -10.47%. Despite the model probability, the price is marked NO_VALUE. The signal is therefore not treated automatically as a value bet.
2 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. Both Teams Score — Yes (odds 1.55). At least one goal in the match (quota 21, score 85/100, 84.63% group success rate across 950 observations).
The match between Elgin City and Ross County ended 1-2. The game produced 3 goals in total. The first half contained 2 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The historical profile from 3 head-to-head meetings averaged 4 goals, while this match produced 3. The result remained within one goal of the historical average. Across the previous 3 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was No BTTS at 66.7%. The actual outcome for this indicator was BTTS. The final result did not align with that historical profile. Across the previous 3 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Over 2.5 at 66.7%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Over 2.5. The final result aligned with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 3.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result.
The stored Premium market was BTTS Yes at odds of 1.55. The actual market outcome was BTTS Yes. The Premium signal was confirmed. The stored Premium market was At least one FT goal with quota 21. The actual market outcome was At least one FT goal. The Premium signal was confirmed.
Of 10 verifiable pre-match indicators, 7 aligned with the final result and 3 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.