Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17.10.2026 | Peterhead - Cove Rangers | 2 - 0 | W |
| 13.10.2026 | Peterhead - Rangers U21 | 1 - 0 | W |
| 10.10.2026 | Peterhead - Queen of the South | 0 - 1 | L |
| 03.10.2026 | Hamilton Academical - Peterhead | 2 - 1 | L |
| 26.09.2026 | Peterhead - Elgin City | 0 - 1 | L |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13.10.2026 | Peterhead - Rangers U21 | 1 - 0 | L |
| 26.09.2026 | Queen of the South - Rangers U21 | 4 - 2 | L |
| 22.09.2026 | Clyde - Rangers U21 | 1 - 2 | W |
| 08.09.2026 | Stirling Albion - Rangers U21 | 3 - 2 | L |
| 25.08.2026 | Bonnyrigg Rose Athletic - Rangers U21 | 2 - 1 | L |
The upcoming match between Peterhead and Rangers U21 is scheduled for 13.10.2026 18:45 in Challenge Cup. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Peterhead recorded 3 wins, 1 draws and 6 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LLLWLLWLDW. The averages are 1 goals scored and 1.50 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals. Rangers U21 recorded 2 wins, 0 draws and 8 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LWLLWLLLLL. The averages are 1.60 goals scored and 2.40 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 70% of those matches, while 90% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 1.5 goals — 90%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 80%; Over 2.5 goals — 80%; Both teams to score — 70%; Under 3.5 goals — 60%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The match between Peterhead and Rangers U21 ended 1-0. The game produced 1 goal in total. The first half contained 1 goal. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated BTTS at 70%. The actual outcome was No BTTS. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 90%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Under 2.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
Of 5 verifiable pre-match indicators, 2 aligned with the final result and 3 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.