📲 Click here and join our FREE Telegram channel GoalLineExpert App
💎 3 Days DIAMOND Free · Register now and activate 72 hours of Diamond access. No card. No automatic billing.
L L ? ? ?
2
🏟 Proxy Club Stadium , Abu El Matamir
✔ Full Time
0
D W ? ? ?
0
Yellow cards
0
0
Red cards
1

🔁 Head-to-Head

1
3
0
🟢 Proxy 🟡 Draws Tersana 🔴
Date Match Score
26.02.2026 Tersana - Proxy 3 : 3
02.10.2025 Proxy - Tersana 1 : 1
21.04.2025 Tersana - Proxy 1 : 2
12.12.2024 Proxy - Tersana 0 : 0

🗓 Latest Matches: Proxy

Date Match Score Res
27.08.2026 Kahraba Ismailia - Proxy 3 - 0 L
21.08.2026 Proxy - Pharco 0 - 1 L
14.05.2026 El Dakhleya - Proxy 0 - 1 W
07.05.2026 Proxy - Olympic El Qanah 2 - 1 W
30.04.2026 Masar - Proxy 2 - 2 D

📆 Latest Matches: Tersana

Date Match Score Res
27.08.2026 Tersana - La Viena FC 0 - 0 D
21.08.2026 El Seka El Hadid - Tersana 0 - 1 W
14.05.2026 El Entag EL Harby - Tersana 1 - 1 D
07.05.2026 Tersana - Abu Qair Semad 0 - 0 D
30.04.2026 Tanta SC - Tersana 2 - 2 D

Pre-match analysis

This analysis is locked and its content can no longer be changed.

Match context

The upcoming match between Proxy and Tersana is scheduled for 04.09.2026 13:30 in Second League. The listed venue is Proxy Club Stadium, Abu El Matamir. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.

Standings and season form
Proxy are in position 19 with 0 points. The stored form sequence is LL. Tersana are in position 7 with 4 points. The stored form sequence is DW.

Recent results

Proxy recorded 5 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LLWWDWWDWD. The averages are 1.40 goals scored and 1.10 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 50% finished with over 2.5 goals. Tersana recorded 3 wins, 5 draws and 2 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is DWDDDWDWLL. The averages are 1 goals scored and 0.80 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 30% finished with over 2.5 goals.

Head-to-head

Across the last 4 head-to-head matches, Proxy recorded 1 wins, there were 3 draws, and Tersana recorded 0 wins. The average total was 2.75 goals per match. Both teams scored in 75% of those matches, while 50% finished with over 2.5 goals.

Trend indicators

The highest stored values are: Under 3.5 goals — 80%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 70%; Under 2.5 goals — 60%; Over 1.5 first-half goals — 50%; Over 1.5 goals — 50%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.

Asian handicap market movement

The normalized movement for the Asian pair Proxy 0 / Tersana 0 supports Tersana by an average 4.04 percentage points across 3 bookmakers (Pinnacle, Bet365, 1xBet) with up to 5 stored observations. This is a market signal, not a result guarantee.

Premium market signals

1 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. Odd/Even — Odd (odds 2.05).

Generated: 2026-09-03 16:00:04 · Locked: 2026-09-04 15:10:05

Post-match review

What happened in the match

The match between Proxy and Tersana ended 2-0. The game produced 2 goals in total. The first half contained 1 goal. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.

Comparison with the head-to-head history

The historical profile from 4 head-to-head meetings averaged 2.75 goals, while this match produced 2. The result remained within one goal of the historical average. Across the previous 4 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was BTTS at 75%. The actual outcome for this indicator was No BTTS. The final result did not align with that historical profile.

Which pre-match trends were confirmed and which were not

Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated No BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was No BTTS. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 2.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.

Asian handicap review

The Asian-handicap signal locked before kickoff supported Tersana at 0. The stored market movement was 4.04 percentage points across 3 bookmakers. At the final score of 2-0, the line settled as a full loss. The Asian-handicap signal was not confirmed.

Premium market review

The stored Premium market was Odd at odds of 2.05. The actual market outcome was Even. The Premium signal was not confirmed.

Summary

Of 8 verifiable pre-match indicators, 5 aligned with the final result and 3 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.

Added after the match: 2026-09-04 17:40:08
GoalLineExpert Support 🟢 Отговаряме възможно най-бързо
Здравей 👋
Напиши въпроса си тук. Ще получим известие и ще ти отговорим възможно най-бързо.