Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08.08.2026 | Aveley - Eastbourne Borough | 2 - 2 | D |
| 28.07.2026 | Tonbridge Angels - Eastbourne Borough | 4 - 2 | L |
| 18.07.2026 | Dover - Eastbourne Borough | - | |
| 25.04.2026 | Chelmsford City - Eastbourne Borough | 1 - 3 | W |
| 18.04.2026 | Eastbourne Borough - AFC Totton | 2 - 3 | L |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08.08.2026 | Three Bridges - Dartford | 2 - 3 | L |
| 25.04.2026 | Faversham Town - Three Bridges | 2 - 2 | D |
| 18.04.2026 | Three Bridges - AFC Croydon Athletic | 3 - 3 | D |
| 11.04.2026 | AFC Whyteleafe - Three Bridges | 0 - 2 | W |
| 06.04.2026 | Three Bridges - Hassocks | 4 - 0 | W |
The upcoming match between Eastbourne Borough and Three Bridges is scheduled for 11.08.2026 18:45 in Non League Premier - Isthmian. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Eastbourne Borough recorded 1 wins, 3 draws and 6 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is DLWLLDLDLL. The averages are 1.60 goals scored and 2.40 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 90% of those matches, while 80% finished with over 2.5 goals. Three Bridges recorded 4 wins, 3 draws and 3 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LDDWWWDLWL. The averages are 1.80 goals scored and 1.40 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 1.5 goals — 100%; Over 2.5 goals — 80%; Both teams to score — 60%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 60%; Over 3.5 goals — 60%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The PMV3 model classifies the leading outcome as Eastbourne Borough to win with 63% confidence. The stored fair probabilities for home, draw and away are 63.50%, 20.82% and 15.68%. The model momentum difference is 47.82 points in favour of Eastbourne Borough. The input data quality score is 96/100. The stored price for the selected market is 1.42 with Bet365. The stored estimated EV is -9.84%. Despite the model probability, the price is marked NO_VALUE. The signal is therefore not treated automatically as a value bet.
3 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. Both Teams Score — Yes (odds 1.78). Goals Over/Under — Over 1.5 (odds 1.20, score 77/100, 77.20% bucket win rate across 386 observations). At least one goal in the match (quota 11.90, score 74/100, 74.25% group success rate across 233 observations).
The match between Eastbourne Borough and Three Bridges ended 3-2. The game produced 5 goals in total. The first half contained 3 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was BTTS. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 100%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 3.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result.
The stored Premium market was BTTS Yes at odds of 1.78. The actual market outcome was BTTS Yes. The Premium signal was confirmed. The stored Premium market was Over 1.5 FT at odds of 1.2. The actual market outcome was Over 1.5 FT. The Premium signal was confirmed. The stored Premium market was At least one FT goal with quota 11.9. The actual market outcome was At least one FT goal. The Premium signal was confirmed.
Of 9 verifiable pre-match indicators, 8 aligned with the final result and 1 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.