Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14.08.2026 | AFC Emley - Curzon Ashton | 2 - 1 | W |
| 11.08.2026 | AFC Emley - Ilkeston Town | 1 - 2 | L |
| 08.08.2026 | Hyde United - AFC Emley | 0 - 0 | D |
| 14.07.2026 | AFC Emley - Rotherham | 1 - 1 | D |
| 25.04.2026 | AFC Emley - Newton Aycliffe | 6 - 0 | W |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14.08.2026 | AFC Emley - Curzon Ashton | 2 - 1 | L |
| 11.08.2026 | Bury - Curzon Ashton | 3 - 2 | L |
| 08.08.2026 | Curzon Ashton - Alfreton Town | 1 - 0 | W |
| 01.08.2026 | Curzon Ashton - FC Halifax Town | 0 - 1 | L |
| 25.04.2026 | Alfreton Town - Curzon Ashton | 3 - 3 | D |
The upcoming match between AFC Emley and Curzon Ashton is scheduled for 14.08.2026 18:45 in Non League Premier - Northern. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
AFC Emley recorded 1 wins, 6 draws and 3 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LDDWDLDDLD. The averages are 1.30 goals scored and 1.10 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 40% finished with over 2.5 goals. Curzon Ashton recorded 2 wins, 3 draws and 5 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LWLDLWLDLD. The averages are 1.10 goals scored and 1.80 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 40% of those matches, while 50% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 0.5 first-half goals — 70%; Over 1.5 goals — 70%; Under 2.5 goals — 60%; Under 3.5 goals — 60%; Both teams to score — 40%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The normalized movement for the Asian pair AFC Emley 0 / Curzon Ashton 0 supports AFC Emley by an average 2.93 percentage points across 3 bookmakers (Pinnacle, Bet365, 1xBet) with up to 3 stored observations. This is a market signal, not a result guarantee.
2 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. Both Teams Score — Yes (odds 1.47). At least one goal in the match (quota 13.30, score 85/100, 85.19% group success rate across 81 observations).
The match between AFC Emley and Curzon Ashton ended 2-1. The game produced 3 goals in total. The first half contained 2 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated No BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was BTTS. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result.
The Asian-handicap signal locked before kickoff supported AFC Emley at 0. The stored market movement was 2.93 percentage points across 3 bookmakers. At the final score of 2-1, the line settled as a full win. The Asian-handicap signal was confirmed.
The stored Premium market was BTTS Yes at odds of 1.47. The actual market outcome was BTTS Yes. The Premium signal was confirmed. The stored Premium market was At least one FT goal with quota 13.3. The actual market outcome was At least one FT goal. The Premium signal was confirmed.
Of 9 verifiable pre-match indicators, 6 aligned with the final result and 3 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.