Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07.08.2026 | Beltinci - Rudar | 2 - 0 | W |
| 01.08.2026 | Beltinci - Al-Faisaly FC | 1 - 3 | L |
| 22.07.2026 | Beltinci - Sharjah FC | 0 - 4 | L |
| 10.07.2026 | Sturm Graz II - Beltinci | 2 - 3 | W |
| 05.07.2026 | Beltinci - Mura | 4 - 1 | W |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01.08.2026 | Beltinci - Al-Faisaly FC | 1 - 3 | W |
| 22.07.2026 | TSC Backa Topola - Al-Faisaly FC | - | |
| 14.05.2026 | Al-Faisaly FC - Al Baten | 4 - 0 | W |
| 09.05.2026 | Al Bukayriyah - Al-Faisaly FC | 0 - 2 | W |
| 02.05.2026 | Al-Faisaly FC - Al Jabalain | 2 - 0 | W |
The upcoming match between Beltinci and Al-Faisaly FC is scheduled for 01.08.2026 16:00 in Friendlies Clubs. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Beltinci recorded 7 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LWWWLLWWWW. The averages are 2.10 goals scored and 1.30 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 70% finished with over 2.5 goals. Al-Faisaly FC recorded 9 wins, 1 draws and 0 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WWWWWWWWDW. The averages are 2.80 goals scored and 0.50 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 40% of those matches, while 70% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 0.5 first-half goals — 100%; Over 1.5 goals — 100%; Over 1.5 first-half goals — 70%; Over 2.5 goals — 70%; Over 3.5 goals — 60%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The match between Beltinci and Al-Faisaly FC ended 1-3. The game produced 4 goals in total. The first half contained 1 goal. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated No BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was BTTS. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 100%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 3.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 100%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 HT at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result.
Of 6 verifiable pre-match indicators, 4 aligned with the final result and 2 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.