Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 06.02.2026 | Al-Dhafra - Khorfakkan | 2 : 3 |
| 02.01.2026 | Khorfakkan - Al-Dhafra | 2 : 3 |
| 18.04.2023 | Al-Dhafra - Khorfakkan | 1 : 3 |
| 11.11.2022 | Khorfakkan - Al-Dhafra | 4 : 3 |
| 05.03.2022 | Al-Dhafra - Khorfakkan | 4 : 1 |
| 04.12.2021 | Al-Dhafra - Khorfakkan | 1 : 2 |
| 24.09.2021 | Khorfakkan - Al-Dhafra | 3 : 0 |
| 07.03.2021 | Khorfakkan - Al-Dhafra | 5 : 1 |
| 21.11.2020 | Al-Dhafra - Khorfakkan | 2 : 0 |
| 10.12.2019 | Khorfakkan - Al-Dhafra | 0 : 2 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22.08.2026 | Al Ain - Khorfakkan | 2 - 0 | L |
| 15.08.2026 | Khorfakkan - Shabab Al Ahli Dubai | 1 - 5 | L |
| 15.05.2026 | Sharjah FC - Khorfakkan | 3 - 1 | L |
| 11.05.2026 | Khorfakkan - Al Wahda FC | 1 - 1 | D |
| 05.05.2026 | Al-Ittihad Kalba - Khorfakkan | 0 - 0 | D |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22.08.2026 | Shabab Al Ahli Dubai - Al-Dhafra | 2 - 0 | L |
| 15.08.2026 | Al-Dhafra - Sharjah FC | 1 - 3 | L |
| 16.05.2026 | Al-Dhafra - Al Wahda FC | 1 - 0 | W |
| 10.05.2026 | Al Ain - Al-Dhafra | 5 - 0 | L |
| 05.05.2026 | Baniyas SC - Al-Dhafra | 2 - 2 | D |
The upcoming match between Khorfakkan and Al-Dhafra is scheduled for 29.08.2026 13:55 in Pro League. The listed venue is Saqr bin Mohammad al Qassimi Stadium, Khor Fakkan. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Standings and season form
Khorfakkan are in position 14 with 0 points. The stored form sequence is LL. Al-Dhafra are in position 13 with 0 points. The stored form sequence is LL.
Khorfakkan recorded 1 wins, 5 draws and 4 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LLLDDDDWLD. The averages are 1 goals scored and 1.90 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 70% of those matches, while 50% finished with over 2.5 goals. Al-Dhafra recorded 1 wins, 1 draws and 8 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LLWLDLLLLL. The averages are 0.50 goals scored and 2 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 30% of those matches, while 50% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 10 head-to-head matches, Khorfakkan recorded 6 wins, there were 0 draws, and Al-Dhafra recorded 4 wins. The average total was 4.20 goals per match. Both teams scored in 70% of those matches, while 80% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 1.5 goals — 80%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 70%; Under 3.5 goals — 70%; Under 2.5 goals — 60%; Both teams to score — 50%. The stored corner indicators are: average total corners — 9.30; over 7.5 corners — 100%; over 8.5 corners — 100%; over 9.5 corners — 98%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The normalized movement for the Asian pair Khorfakkan -0.25 / Al-Dhafra +0.25 supports Al-Dhafra by an average 1.55 percentage points across 3 bookmakers (Pinnacle, Bet365, 1xBet) with up to 7 stored observations. This is a market signal, not a result guarantee.
2 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. At least one goal in the match (quota 12.50, score 88/100, 88.14% group success rate across 59 observations). Goals Over/Under — Over 1.5 (odds 1.20, score 79/100, 78.97% bucket win rate across 504 observations).
The discipline profile for Al-Dhafra away from home is based on 1 matches. The team averages 2.00 yellow cards, 0.00 red cards and 2.00 total cards per match. At least 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cards were recorded in 100.0%, 100.0%, 0.0%, 0.0% and 0.0% of those matches respectively, while a red card occurred in 0.0%. Season card data is available for 2 of 2 completed matches (100.0% coverage).
The match between Khorfakkan and Al-Dhafra ended 2-0. The game produced 2 goals in total. The first half contained 0 goals. The verified final statistics recorded 6 corners in total. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The previous 10 head-to-head meetings averaged 4.2 goals, while this match produced 2. The final scoring profile differed by more than one goal from that average. Across the previous 10 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was BTTS at 70%. The actual outcome for this indicator was No BTTS. The final result did not align with that historical profile. Across the previous 10 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Over 2.5 at 80%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Under 2.5. The final result did not align with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 2.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. The stored pre-match average was 9.3 total corners. The match recorded 6 corners in total. The result differed by more than one corner from the stored average. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 7.5 corners at 100%. The actual outcome was Under 7.5 corners. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 8.5 corners at 100%. The actual outcome was Under 8.5 corners. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 9.5 corners at 98%. The actual outcome was Under 9.5 corners. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 0.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
Before kickoff, the discipline profile for Al-Dhafra away from home was based on 1 matches, with averages of 2 yellow cards, 0 red cards and 2 total cards per match. In this game, Al-Dhafra received 1 yellow cards and 0 red cards, 1 in total. That was 1 cards below the stored average. In the pre-match sample, 3+ cards occurred in 0% of matches, 5+ in 0%, and a red card in 0%.
The Asian-handicap signal locked before kickoff supported Al-Dhafra at +0.25. The stored market movement was 1.55 percentage points across 3 bookmakers. At the final score of 2-0, the line settled as a full loss. The Asian-handicap signal was not confirmed.
The stored Premium market was At least one FT goal with quota 12.5. The actual market outcome was At least one FT goal. The Premium signal was confirmed. The stored Premium market was Over 1.5 FT at odds of 1.2. The actual market outcome was Over 1.5 FT. The Premium signal was confirmed.
Of 15 verifiable pre-match indicators, 6 aligned with the final result and 9 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.